...
首页> 外文期刊>Group dynamics: theory, research, and practice >Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) Progress Alert Rates in Group Versus Individual Treatment: An Archival Replication
【24h】

Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) Progress Alert Rates in Group Versus Individual Treatment: An Archival Replication

机译:结果Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45)进步警觉在团体和个人治疗:一个档案复制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a recent study involving routine outcome monitoring (ROM), Burlingame and colleagues (2018) found that the clients in group treatment yielded significantly more not-on-track (NOT) progress alerts during treatment compared to individual treatment. Additionally, nonequivalence was found in the timing of the first NOT alerts, with group treatment's first alerts occurring two sessions later than individual treatment. Because past research has generally demonstrated equivalence between the effects of individual and group therapy, the current study aims to determine whether these rate and timing differences are replicable. Without sufficient evidence that the NOT alerts' frequency and temporal patterns found previously are common across group therapies, we hypothesized that a new data source would show no difference between rate and timing of NOT alerts between group and individual therapy. Frequency and timing data of NOT alerts from archival Outcome Questionnaire administrations in a comparable counseling center (N = 5,639, M-age = 25.7, female = 58.4%. Caucasian = 78.4%) were analyzed and compared to Burlingame et al.'s (2018) results. The current study replicated the significant difference found in the rate of NOT alerts between treatment formats (p = .007). Additionally, the timing of NOT alerts created a more complex picture. Burlingame et al.'s (2018) results may be more common as preliminary results suggest that clients in group therapy are more likely to alert as NOT during the course of therapy when compared to clients in individual therapy. Implications of these findings are discussed.
机译:在最近的一项研究中涉及常规的结果监控(ROM),伯林盖姆和同事(2018)发现,在治疗组客户产生了更多not-on-track(不)在治疗相比,进步警报个人待遇。非等价被发现的时间第一次没有警报,团体治疗的第一个警报发生两个交易日之后个人待遇。通常证明之间的等价性个人和团体治疗的效果本研究旨在确定这些速度和时间差异是可复制的。没有足够的证据,不提醒的频率和时间模式发现之前是常见的跨组疗法,我们呢假设一个新的数据源不会显示差异率和时间的警报团体和个人之间的疗法。从档案和时间数据的警报结果问卷调查政府的与咨询中心(N = 5639, M-age =25.7,女性= 58.4%。分析和比伯林盖姆et al(2018)的结果。显著差异中发现的速度警报处理格式之间(p = .007)。此外,创建了一个的时机不是警报更复杂的图景。结果可能是更常见的初步结果建议客户在团体治疗更过程中不可能警觉治疗相比,在个人客户治疗。进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号