...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of transport & health. >Can traffic management strategies improve urban air quality? A review of the evidence
【24h】

Can traffic management strategies improve urban air quality? A review of the evidence

机译:交通管理策略可以改善城市空气质量吗? 证据的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper reviews the effectiveness of traffic management strategies (TMS) for mitigating emissions, ambient concentrations, human exposure, and health effects of traffic-related air pollution in urban areas. The objective is to summarize the evidence base for a range of moderate-scale strategies broadly relevant to municipal and regional government decision-making. A systematic literature search was carried out to identify empirical studies of TMS effects on emissions, air quality, exposure, or health. Identified studies were reviewed to assess the state of evidence that TMS can improve urban air quality and pollution-related health outcomes for exposed populations. Overall, the evidence base is weak for these effects. There is limited evidence of effects on emissions for 7 of the 22 studied strategies, and limited evidence of effects on air quality for 2 of the strategies: area road pricing and low emission zones. Insufficient evidence exists for all other TMS and effects. Existing evidence suggests that aggressive area-based TMS such as low emission zones are needed to generate substantial air quality benefits, and that TMS must be implemented with care to avoid unintended detrimental and rebound effects. The evidence base is limited by a lack of ex post evaluations Of implemented strategies, lack of evaluation of exposure and health impacts, small intervention effects relative to the influences of other factors, and insufficient evaluation of spillover and indirect effects. Evolving vehicle fleets add further uncertainty to the long-range effects of TMS on air quality. Effects of TMS on measured population exposure and public health outcomes have not been well-studied. An evidence-based approach to transportation systems planning necessitates additional resource allocation to ex post evaluations and performance monitoring for air quality impacts of traffic management strategies.
机译:本文回顾了交通管理策略(TMS)对减轻排放,环境浓度,人类暴露以及与交通相关空气污染在城市地区的健康影响的有效性。目的是总结一系列与市政和区域政府决策广泛相关的中等规模策略的证据基础。进行了系统的文献搜索,以确定TMS对排放,空气质量,暴露或健康的影响的经验研究。对确定的研究进行了审查,以评估TMS可以改善城市空气质量和与污染有关的健康结果的证据状态。总体而言,这些影响的证据基础很弱。在22种研究策略中,有7种对排放的影响有限,有限的证据证明了2种策略的空气质量影响:区域道路定价和低排放区。所有其他TMS和效果的证据不足。现有的证据表明,基于积极的区域的TMS(例如低排放区)需要产生可观的空气质量优势,并且必须谨慎实施TMS,以避免意外的有害和反弹效应。证据基础受到对实施策略的未能评估,缺乏对暴露和健康影响的评估,相对于其他因素的影响的较小的干预影响以及对溢出和间接影响的评估不足的限制。不断发展的车队为TMS对空气质量的远程影响增加了进一步的不确定性。 TMS对测量人口暴露和公共卫生结果的影响尚未得到充分研究。基于证据的运输系统计划计划需要进行其他资源分配,以便在评估后进行绩效监控,以监视交通管理策略的空气质量影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号