...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of transport & health. >Understanding bicycling in cities using system dynamics modelling
【24h】

Understanding bicycling in cities using system dynamics modelling

机译:使用系统动态建模了解城市的骑自行车

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Increasing urban bicycling has established net benefits for human and environmental health. Questions remain about which policies are needed and in what order, to achieve an increase in cycling while avoiding negative consequences. Novel ways of considering cycling policy are needed, bringing together expertise across policy, community and research to develop a shared understanding of the dynamically complex cycling system. In this paper we use a collaborative learning process to develop a dynamic causal model of urban cycling to develop consensus about the nature and order of policies needed in different cycling contexts to optimise outcomes.Methods: We used participatory system dynamics modelling to develop causal loop diagrams (CLDs) of cycling in three contrasting contexts: Auckland, London and Nijmegen. We combined qualitative interviews and workshops to develop the CLDs. We used the three CLDs to compare and contrast influences on cycling at different points on a "cycling trajectory" and drew out policy insights.Results: The three CLDs consisted of feedback loops dynamically influencing cycling, with significant overlap between the three diagrams. Common reinforcing patterns emerged: growing numbers of people cycling lifts political will to improve the environment; cycling safety in numbers drives further growth; and more cycling can lead to normalisation across the population. By contrast, limits to growth varied as cycling increases. In Auckland and London, real and perceived danger was considered the main limit, with added barriers to normalisation in London. Cycling congestion and "market saturation" were important in the Netherlands. Conclusions: A generalisable, dynamic causal theory for urban cycling enables a more ordered set of policy recommendations for different cities on a cycling trajectory. Participation meant the collective knowledge of cycling stakeholders was represented and triangulated with research evidence. Extending this research to further cities, especially in low-middle income countries, would enhance generalizability of the CLDs.
机译:背景:不断增加的城市骑自行车为人类和环境健康树立了净收益。关于需要哪些政策以及以什么顺序进行循环增加的问题,同时避免负面后果。需要考虑骑自行车政策的新颖方法,将跨政策,社区和研究的专业知识融合在一起,以对动态复杂的骑自行车系统有共同的了解。在本文中,我们使用协作学习过程来开发一个动态的城市循环因果模型,以在不同自行车环境中需要的政策性质和顺序达成共识,以优化结果。 (CLDS)在三个对比背景下骑自行车:奥克兰,伦敦和尼加梅根。我们结合了定性访谈和研讨会来开发CLD。我们使用三个CLD来比较和对比对“骑自行车轨迹”上不同点的骑自行车的影响,并汲取了策略洞察力。分子:三个CLD由动态影响循环的反馈回路组成,并在三个图之间进行显着重叠。出现了共同的加强模式:越来越多的人骑自行车提升政治意愿改善环境;数量的骑自行车安全驱动了进一步的增长;更多的骑自行车可以导致整个人群的归一化。相比之下,随着循环的增加,生长的限制各不相同。在奥克兰和伦敦,真正的和感知的危险被认为是主要极限,在伦敦的正常化障碍中增加了障碍。在荷兰,骑自行车的拥塞和“市场饱和度”很重要。结论:城市自行车的一种普遍的动态因果理论,可以为不同城市的自行车轨迹上的一组政策建议集。参与意味着对骑自行车利益相关者的集体知识代表并用研究证据进行了三角测量。将这项研究扩展到更多城市,尤其是中低水平的国家,将提高CLD的普遍性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号