...
首页> 外文期刊>Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine. >Orbital Roof Fractures: An Evidence-Based Approach
【24h】

Orbital Roof Fractures: An Evidence-Based Approach

机译:轨道屋顶断裂:一种基于证据的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Importance:There is controversy surrounding the management of orbital roof fractures. Guidelines with regard to when to operate and type of reconstruction are lacking. Categorizing these data will help clinicians make informed decisions about the management of orbital roof fractures and avoid preventable complications. Objective:To perform a systematic review evaluating underlying causes, associated complications, and management of orbital roof fractures including reconstructive options in the general population of children and adults. Evidence Review:A systematic review using the PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases identified relevant studies for inclusion. Studies were included from 1987 to 2017. Demographics, symptoms, management, reconstruction, and outcomes were reported following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria included articles discussing management of traumatic orbital roof fractures across all ages. Included studies were assessed for level of evidence. Findings:Forty-seven studies encompassing 526 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 28 case reports, 15 retrospective case series and 4 retrospective cohort studies. The most common etiologies were motor vehicle accidents (39.5%), falls (30.3%), and assault (11.8%). Periorbital ecchymosis, exophthalmos, and dystopia were the most common initial symptoms. In total, 60.0% of patients underwent surgical repair and 40% of patients were managed conservatively. The most common surgical approach was bicoronal (94.8%), followed by a superolateral orbital rim approach and transpalpebral (5.1%). A variety of grafting materials were utilized, including titanium miniplates (46.2%), bone graft (37.7%), porous polyethylene (2.8%), and silastic implants (2.8%). Overall patients undergoing surgery were adults with clinical symptoms including exophthalmos, diplopia, and gaze restriction as well as patients with dura exposure. Most patients undergoing surgery were those with concomitant fractures. The most common fractures among the surgical patients were frontal bone (32.2%), ethmoid (25.2%), and zygomaticomaxillary complex/zygoma (12.2%). Conclusions and Relevance:Management of orbital roof fractures varies based on individual clinical features including the presence of exophthalmos, gaze restriction, and concomitant injuries such as dural tears. Surgically, bicoronal approaches were performed most commonly along with reconstruction utilizing titanium miniplates. Conservative management was more common among the pediatric population. This systematic review demonstrates both conservative and surgical measures can lead to positive outcomes in appropriately selected patients.
机译:重要性:围绕轨道屋顶断裂的管理存在争议。缺乏关于何时进行操作和类型的准则。对这些数据进行分类将有助于临床医生就轨道屋顶断裂的管理做出明智的决定,并避免可预防的并发症。目的:进行系统的审查,评估基本原因,相关并发症和轨道屋顶断裂的管理,包括儿童和成人普通人群的重建选择。证据综述:使用PubMed,Embase,Cochrane和Medline数据库的系统综述确定了相关研究的包含研究。从1987年到2017年进行了研究。在系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目之后,人口统计学,症状,管理,重建和结果报告。纳入标准包括讨论所有年龄段创伤性轨道屋顶骨折的管理文章。评估了纳入的研究以获取证据水平。研究结果:包括526名患者的47项研究符合纳入标准。有28个病例报告,15个回顾性病例序列和4项回顾性队列研究。最常见的病因是机动车事故(39.5%),跌倒(30.3%)和攻击(11.8%)。周围的围肌,外科观念和反乌托邦是最常见的初始症状。总共有60.0%的患者接受手术修复,40%的患者进行了保守管理。最常见的外科手术方法是双龙(94.8%),其次是上外侧轨道边缘方法和转骨(5.1%)。利用了各种嫁接材料,包括钛最小值(46.2%),骨移植物(37.7%),多孔聚乙烯(2.8%)和silastic植入物(2.8%)。正在接受手术的总体患者是患有临床症状的成年人,包括外科视神经,复视和凝视限制以及硬脑膜暴露的患者。大多数接受手术的患者是伴有骨折的患者。手术患者中最常见的骨折是额骨(32.2%),筛蛋白(25.2%)和Zygomaticomamaxillary复合物/Zygoma(12.2%)。结论和相关性:轨道屋顶骨折的管理根据各个临床特征而有所不同,包括存在外科视神经,凝视限制和伴随伤害(例如硬脑膜泪水)。从外科手术上,使用钛少量的重建最常见的是双色方法。保守派管理在小儿人群中更为普遍。 This systematic review demonstrates both conservative and surgical measures can lead to positive outcomes in appropriately selected patients.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号