...
首页> 外文期刊>Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine. >Evaluation of the Quality of Printed Online Education Materials in Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery
【24h】

Evaluation of the Quality of Printed Online Education Materials in Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery

机译:评估化妆品面部整形手术中印刷在线教育材料的质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

abstract_textpImportance: In the modern-day health care environment, it is expected that a large proportion of patients will utilize the Internet to gather health care-related information. However, online sources are often not subjected to adequate quality control measures./ppObjective: To evaluate the quality of printed online education materials (POEMs) pertaining to elective facial cosmetic surgery./ppDesign, Setting, and Participants: This is a descriptive correlational study. Independent Internet searches for the terms "rhinoplasty," "rhytidectomy," "blepharoplasty," and "browlift" were carried out using the Google search engine. The top 20 web resources for each term were analyzed./ppMain Outcomes and Measures: All web resources were analyzed for HONcode certification. The DISCERN instrument was then used to determine reliability and specificity of information, whereas readability was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL)./ppResults: Of the resulting 80 web resources, 30% (n = 24) were HONcode certified. None of the surgical society web resources (n = 12) were HONcode certified, and only 42% (n = 8) of web resources associated with academic institutions were HONcode certified. Out of a maximum DISCERN score of 80, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) scores were 48 (11) for rhinoplasty, 50 (11) for rhytidectomy, 47 (11) for blepharoplasty, and 45 (10) for browlift. The mean DISCERN scores of the HONcode-certified web resources did not differ significantly from scores of uncertified web resources (p = 0.069). There was no significant difference in overall mean DISCERN scores for the different web resource categories. The mean (SD) FRE score was 45.7 (11.9), whereas the mean FKGL score was 10.7 (1.9). HONcode-certified web resources had significantly higher FRE scores (p = 0.028) and significantly lower FKGL scores (p = 0.0003)./ppConclusions and Relevance: A significant proportion of POEMs regarding elective cosmetic facial plastic surgery remains uncertified and of inadequate quality. This can negatively impact the informed decision-making process and increase the risk of poor outcomes and lower satisfaction rates./p/abstract_text
机译:& abstract_text&&&重要性:在现代医疗保健环境中,预计很大一部分患者将利用互联网来收集与医疗保健相关的信息。但是,在线资源通常不受足够的质量控制措施。 ; p&设计,设置和参与者:这是一项描述性相关研究。独立的互联网使用Google搜索引擎进行了独立的术语“隆鼻术”,“ Rhytid Contrasto”,“ Rhytidcept术”,“抛脑成形术”和“ Blepharoptasty”和“ Browlift”。分析了每个学期的前20个Web资源。然后,使用辨别工具来确定信息的可靠性和特异性,而使用验收的阅读易度(fre)得分和验收级别(FKGL)(FKGL)。由此产生的80个Web资源,30%(n = 24)获得了荣誉认证。没有一个手术社会的网络资源(n = 12)均未获得荣誉认证,与学术机构相关的Web资源中只有42%(n = 8)获得了荣誉资格认证。在最大辨别得分中,隆鼻术的平均分数为48(11),节奏切除术的平均分数为48(11),孔质成形术的平均分数为47(11),而45(11)对于Browlift来说为45(11)。荣誉认证的Web资源的平均分数与未认证的Web资源的分数没有显着差异(p = 0.069)。不同Web资源类别的总体平均分数没有显着差异。平均(SD)FRE得分为45.7(11.9),而平均FKGL得分为10.7(1.9)。获得HonCode认证的Web资源的FRE得分明显更高(P = 0.028),而FKGL得分明显较低(P = 0.0003)。仍然没有证实,质量不足。这可能会对知情的决策过程产生负面影响,并增加结果不良和降低满意度的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号