...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Business Policy >Corporate uptake of the Sustainable Development Goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change?
【24h】

Corporate uptake of the Sustainable Development Goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change?

机译:企业对可持续发展目标的采用:仅仅是绿化还是机构变革的到来?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The United Nations' Sustainable Development Coals (SDGs) are increasingly used by corporations for benchmarking and communicating their sustainability performance. The SDGs have several features that make them attractive for this purpose, including their universality, specificity and, in many cases, direct linkage with corporate outcomes. Corporations typically disclose their engagement strategies and outcomes voluntarily without the aid of standardized and externally verified reports. This creates arisk of corporations misusing the SDGs for "greenwashing" and "impact washing" their activities, for example through selective reporting of favorable information. Inaccurate and non-transparent disclosure can also introduce information asymmetries thatdistort decision-making by investors and other stakeholders. Increasing institutional change towards new measurement frameworks (such as GRI and SASB standards) and regulatory oversight to monitor disclosure (e.g., the EU's Non-Financial Reporting Directive) is likely to improve transparency and reliability in sustainability reporting. This study critically examines the prospects of institutional changes that facilitate the integration, measurement, and reporting of corporate sustainability in general and the SDGs in particular. It also explores emerging innovations in corporate governance and regulation that seek to improve the integration of sustainability issues in corporations and financial markets.
机译:公司越来越多地使用联合国的可持续发展煤(SDG)来基准和传达其可持续性绩效。可持续发展目标具有几个功能,使其为此目的具有吸引力,包括其普遍性,特异性,并且在许多情况下是与公司成果直接联系的。公司通常会在没有标准化和外部验证的报告的帮助下自愿披露其参与策略和结果。这创造了公司滥用可持续发展目标的公司的“绿色洗涤”和“冲击洗涤”的活动,例如通过选择性报告有利的信息。不准确和非透明的披露还可以引入投资者和其他利益相关者决策的信息不对称。对新的测量框架(例如GRI和SASB标准)和监控披露的监管(例如,欧盟的非金融报告指令)的机构变化增加可能会提高可持续性报告中的透明度和可靠性。这项研究批判性地研究了制度变化的前景,这些变化促进了公司可持续性的整合,测量和报告,尤其是可持续发展目标。它还探讨了公司治理和法规中新兴的创新,以提高公司和金融市场可持续性问题的整合。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号