...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing >STANDARDIZED TESTING PRACTICES: EFFECT ON GRADUATION AND NCLEX (R) PASS RATES
【24h】

STANDARDIZED TESTING PRACTICES: EFFECT ON GRADUATION AND NCLEX (R) PASS RATES

机译:标准化的测试实践:对毕业和NCLEX(R)通行证的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The use standardized testing in pre-licensure nursing programs has been accompanied by conflicting reports of effective practices. The purpose of this project was to describe standardized testing practices in one states' nursing programs and discover if the use of a cut score or oversight of remediation had any effect on (a) first time NCLEX (R) pass rates, (b) on-time graduation (OTG) or (c) the combination of (a) and (b). Administrators of 38 nursing programs in one Southwest state were sent surveys; surveys were returned by 34 programs (89%). Survey responses were compared to each program's NCLEX pass rate and on-time graduation rate; t-tests were conducted for significant differences associated with a required minimum score (cut score) and oversight of remediation. There were no significant differences in NCLEX pass or on-time graduation rates related to establishment of a cut score. There was a significant difference when the NCLEX pass rate and on-time graduation rate were combined (Outcome Index "OI") with significantly higher program outcomes (P = .02.) for programs without cut-scores. There were no differences associated with faculty oversight of remediation. The results of this study do not support establishment of a cut-score when implementing a standardized testing. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc
机译:在执业前护理项目中使用标准化测试的同时,关于有效实践的报告也相互矛盾。本项目的目的是描述一个州护理项目中的标准化测试实践,并发现使用分数削减或对补救措施的监督是否对(a)首次NCLEX(R)通过率,(b)按时毕业(OTG)或(c)结合(a)和(b)有任何影响。对西南部一个州的38个护理项目的管理人员进行了调查;34个项目(89%)返回了调查结果。将调查结果与每个项目的NCLEX通过率和准时毕业率进行比较;对与要求的最低分数(削减分数)和补救监督相关的显著差异进行t检验。在NCLEX及格率或与建立分数相关的准时毕业率方面没有显著差异。当NCLEX通过率和准时毕业率(结果指数“OI”)与显著更高的项目结果(P=0.02)相结合时,有显著差异对于没有分数削减的项目。教师对补救措施的监督没有差异。这项研究的结果不支持在实施标准化测试时建立评分标准。(C) 2016年由爱思唯尔公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号