...
首页> 外文期刊>Annual Review of Psychology >Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice
【24h】

Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice

机译:减少偏见:什么有效?研究与实践回顾与评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article reviews the observational, laboratory, and field experimental literatures on interventions for reducing prejudice. Our review places special emphasis on assessing the methodological rigor of existing research, calling attention to problems of design and measurement that threaten both internal and external validity. Of the hundreds of studies we examine, a small fraction speak convincingly to the questions of whether, why, and under what conditions a given type of intervention works. We conclude that the causal effects of many widespread prejudice-reduction interventions, such as workplace diversity training and media campaigns, remain unknown. Although some intergroup contact and cooperation interventions appear promising, a much more rigorous and broad-ranging empirical assessment of prejudice-reduction strategies is needed to determine what works.
机译:本文回顾了有关减少偏见的干预措施的观察,实验室和现场实验文献。我们的审查特别强调评估现有研究方法的严谨性,呼吁人们注意威胁内部和外部有效性的设计和测量问题。在我们研究的数百项研究中,一小部分令人信服地说明了给定类型的干预措施是否有效,为什么以及在什么条件下起作用的问题。我们得出的结论是,许多广泛的减少偏见干预措施(例如工作场所多样性培训和媒体运动)的因果关系仍然未知。尽管某些群体间的接触和合作干预措施似乎很有希望,但仍需要对减少偏见策略进行更为严格和广泛的实证评估,以确定有效的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号