首页> 外文期刊>Pure and Applied Geophysics >Reply to the Comment on the Paper 'Seismic Hazard Analysis of Surface Level, Using Topographic Condition in Northeast of Algeria' by Mohamed Hamdache and Jose A. Pelaez
【24h】

Reply to the Comment on the Paper 'Seismic Hazard Analysis of Surface Level, Using Topographic Condition in Northeast of Algeria' by Mohamed Hamdache and Jose A. Pelaez

机译:回复关于穆罕默德Hamdache和Jose A. Pelaez的“阿尔及利亚东北地震灾害分析的论文评论”表面级别。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have kindly received the comments by Hamdache and Pelaez on our published paper (Hamidatou et al. 2019); This article will give us the opportunity to provide more explanation and clarifications on the methodology followed during our work. We find these comments and critiques helpful for our future works. However, most of them were generated from the misapprehension of the paper by the comment authors. These remarks were mainly based on (1) the misjudging of the seismic source zone model used in relation to the active faults in the study area, (2) suspecting that the probabilistic seismic hazard PGA values were wrongly quoted from their analyses in our work, and (3) the logic tree usage , for which we here provide further general clarifications.
机译:我们已收到Hamdache和Pelaez对我们发表论文的评论(Hamidatou等人,2019年);本文将为我们提供机会,对我们工作中遵循的方法进行更多解释和澄清。我们发现这些评论和评论对我们未来的工作很有帮助。然而,其中大多数是由于评论作者对论文的误解而产生的。这些评论主要基于(1)对与研究区域活动断层相关的震源区模型的误判,(2)怀疑在我们的工作中错误地引用了概率地震危险PGA值,以及(3)逻辑树的使用,我们在此提供进一步的一般性澄清。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号