...
首页> 外文期刊>Pattern Recognition: The Journal of the Pattern Recognition Society >Comparing two classes of end-to-end machine-learning models in lung nodule detection and classification: MTANNs vs. CNNs
【24h】

Comparing two classes of end-to-end machine-learning models in lung nodule detection and classification: MTANNs vs. CNNs

机译:比较肺结核检测和分类中的两类端到端机器学习模型:MTANNS与CNNS

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

End-to-end learning machines enable a direct mapping from the raw input data to the desired outputs, eliminating the need for hand-crafted features. Despite less engineering effort than the hand-crafted counterparts, these learning machines achieve extremely good results for many computer vision and medical image analysis tasks. Two dominant classes of end-to-end learning machines are massive-training artificial neural networks (MTANNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Although MTANNs have been actively used for a number of medical image analysis tasks over the past two decades, CNNs have recently gained popularity in the field of medical imaging. In this study, we have compared these two successful learning machines both experimentally and theoretically. For that purpose, we considered two well-studied topics in the field of medical image analysis: detection of lung nodules and distinction between benign and malignant lung nodules in computed tomography (CT). For a thorough analysis, we used 2 optimized MTANN architectures and 4 distinct CNN architectures that have different depths. Our experiments demonstrated that the performance of MTANNs was substantially higher than that of CNN when using only limited training data. With a larger training dataset, the performance gap became less evident even though the margin was still significant. Specifically, for nodule detection, MTANNs generated 2.7 false positives per patient at 100% sensitivity, which was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than the best performing CNN model with 22.7 false positives per patient at the same level of sensitivity. For nodule classification, MTANNs yielded an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8806 (95% CI: 0.8389-0.9223), which was significantly (p < 0.05) greater than the best performing CNN model with an AUC of 0.7755 (95% CI: 0.7120-0.8270). Thus, with limited training data, MTANNs would be a suitable end-to-end machine-learning model for detection and classification of focal lesions that do not require high-level semantic features.
机译:端到端学习机实现了从原始输入数据到所需输出的直接映射,消除了手工制作功能的需要。尽管与手工制作的机器相比,这些学习机器的工程工作量较少,但它们在许多计算机视觉和医学图像分析任务中取得了非常好的效果。端到端学习机的两个主要类别是大规模训练人工神经网络(MTANN)和卷积神经网络(CNN)。虽然MTANN在过去20年中已被积极用于许多医学图像分析任务,但CNN最近在医学成像领域得到了普及。在这项研究中,我们从实验和理论上比较了这两种成功的学习机器。为此,我们考虑了医学图像分析领域中两个研究得很好的主题:肺结节的检测和计算机断层扫描(CT)中良恶性肺结节的区分。为了进行彻底的分析,我们使用了2种优化的MTANN架构和4种不同深度的CNN架构。我们的实验表明,当只使用有限的训练数据时,MTANNs的性能远远高于CNN。随着训练数据集的扩大,尽管差距仍然很大,但表现差距变得不那么明显。具体而言,对于结节检测,MTANNs在100%灵敏度下每名患者产生2.7个假阳性,这显著(p<0.05)低于在相同灵敏度水平下每名患者产生22.7个假阳性的最佳CNN模型。对于结节分类,MTANNs得出的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积为0.8806(95%置信区间:0.8389-0.9223),显著(p<0.05)大于最佳CNN模型(AUC为0.7755)(95%置信区间:0.7120-0.8270)。因此,在训练数据有限的情况下,MTANNs将是一个合适的端到端机器学习模型,用于不需要高级语义特征的病灶检测和分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号