...
【24h】

Peer review: Should we modify our process?

机译:同行评审:我们应该修改流程吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The peer review process for bio-medical publications began in the 1700s with the Royal Society of Edinburg's Medical Essays and Observations [1]. Since that time, most medical journals have used peer review to ensure scientific integrity. However, the methods of peer review vary extensively [2]. The approaches are definitely evolving and variable. For example, the processes instituted by a given journal may include single-and double-blinded peer review, open peer review, and postpublishing peer review. Peer review has become even more controversial in the electronic era with the recent explosion in the number of open access journals. There are currently more than 100 radiology journals throughout the world.
机译:生物医学出版物的同行评审过程始于1700年代,由爱丁堡皇家学会的医学论文和观察​​[1]进行。从那时起,大多数医学期刊都使用同行评审来确保科学完整性。但是,同行评审的方法差异很大[2]。这些方法肯定是不断发展变化的。例如,由给定期刊建立的流程可能包括单盲和双盲同行评审,开放式同行评审和发布后的同行评审。随着开放存取期刊的数量最近激增,在电子时代,同行评审变得更具争议性。目前,全世界有100多种放射学期刊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号