...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural processes >Should neuroecologists separate Tinbergen's four questions?
【24h】

Should neuroecologists separate Tinbergen's four questions?

机译:神经生态学家应该单独分隔Tinbergen的四个问题吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Neuroecologists have been criticized for deriving mechanistic explanations about brains and cognition from functional results. Historically, it appears however that the first functional predictions about adaptive hippocampal specialization for spatial memory of stored food were preceded, not followed, by the mechanistic paradigm of massive modularity that was dominant in the 1990s. More attention is paid nowadays to domain general aspects of cognition and to neural connectivity. Attention is also now given to evo devo principles of brain organization, which suggest conserved routes to evolutionary changes in the brain driven by conserved developmental schedules. Knowledge gained in answering each of Tinbergen's four questions is thus useful in making predictions concerning the other ones. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: In Honor of Jerry Hogan. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:神经生态学家被批评从功能结果中导出有关大脑和认知的机制解释。 然而,历史上,它出现了关于储存食物的空间记忆的自适应海马专业的第一种功能预测是,不遵循20世纪90年代的大规模模块化的机械范例。 现在,更多地关注认知的领域的一般方面和神经连接。 现在还注意到Evo Devo原则的脑组织原则,这表明由保守的发展计划驱动的大脑进化变化的节约途径。 在回答Tinbergen的四个问题中获得的知识是有用的,在制定关于另一个的预测。 本文是题为特别问题的一部分:以纪念杰瑞霍恩。 (c)2014 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号