首页> 外文期刊>Pure and Applied Geophysics >On the prediction of tropical cyclones over the indian region using a synthetic vortex scheme in a mesoscale model
【24h】

On the prediction of tropical cyclones over the indian region using a synthetic vortex scheme in a mesoscale model

机译:用中尺度模型中的合成涡旋方案预测印度洋上空的热带气旋

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The tropical cyclones form over the oceanic regions where conventional meteorological observations are not available. This contributes to a poor initial analysis of the cyclonic vortex and hence inadequate forecast. One way of overcoming the above problem is to modify the initial analysis by replacing the weak and ill-defined vortex in the initial analysis with a synthetic vortex having the correct size and intensity at the correct location. In this study we are investigating the effect of inclusion of a synthetic vortex based on Rankine as well as on Holland wind profiles, using NCAR-AFWA bogussing scheme for the prediction of four tropical cyclones, which formed over the Bay of Bengal during November 2002 and 2005, December 2005 and over the Arabian Sea during May 2004, using the MM5 model. Two numerical experiments are designed in this study for each of the above four cyclones. In the first experiment the model is integrated with a synthetic vortex based on Rankine wind profile while in the second experiment we utilize the Holland wind profile. For the November 2002 cyclone, in both the experiments the model is integrated from 10 November 2002 18 UTC to 12 November, 2002 12 UTC with the synthetic vortex inserted at the initial time. The results of the study for the November 2002 cyclone show that the model simulation with the Holland vortex has produced a stronger cyclone in terms of minimum sea-level pressure and maximum wind speed. Also, the results for the November 2002 cyclone with the Holland vortex showed a better longitudinal height section of the horizontal wind speed across the center of the cyclone. The track error of the cyclone for the November 2002 cyclone is less in the model simulation with the Holland vortex at the initial time and at 24 hours of forecast. The results for the November 2002 cyclone with the Rankine vortex showed greater vertical wind speed as compared to the Holland vortex. However, for the November 2002 cyclone there were no significant differences in the spatial distribution of precipitation for both the experiments. In order to provide an adequate number of case studies for a good statistical sample, the present study is extended for three additional cyclones over the Indian region. All four cyclones studied here show that the Holland vortex has produced a stronger cyclone in terms of the minimum sea-level pressure and maximum wind speed. The Holland vortex showed a better vertical structure of wind speed in the longitudinal height section at 24 hours of forecast for the November 2005 cyclone while the structure was better for the Rankine vortex for the remaining two cyclones. There were no significant differences in the spatial distribution of precipitation for the two experiments corresponding to all four cyclones. Some statistical results pertaining to all four cyclones are provided such as the average track error as well as the average difference between the observed and the model minimum sea-level pressure and the maximum wind speed. The statistical results corresponding to the average of all the four cyclones are at only a slight variance with the results corresponding to the November 2002 cyclone.
机译:热带气旋形成于没有常规气象观测的海洋区域。这导致对旋风涡旋的初始分析不佳,从而导致预报不足。克服上述问题的一种方法是通过用在正确位置具有正确大小和强度的合成旋涡代替初始分析中的弱和不确定的旋涡来修改初始分析。在这项研究中,我们使用NCAR-AFWA伪造方案预测了2002年11月在孟加拉湾上空形成的四个热带气旋,并研究了基于Rankine和荷兰风廓线的合成涡旋的影响。 2005年,2005年12月以及2004年5月使用MM5模型在阿拉伯海上空。在这项研究中,针对上述四个旋风中的每一个设计了两个数值实验。在第一个实验中,该模型与基于Rankine风廓线的合成涡流集成在一起,而在第二个实验中,我们利用Holland风廓线。对于2002年11月的气旋,在这两个实验中,该模型从2002年11月10日18 UTC到2002年11月12日12 UTC集成在一起,并在初始时间插入了合成涡旋。 2002年11月气旋的研究结果表明,在最小海平面压力和最大风速方面,使用荷兰涡旋进行的模型模拟产生了更强的气旋。同样,2002年11月带有荷兰涡旋的旋风的结果显示,横风越过旋风中心时,水平风速的纵向高度更好。 2002年11月气旋的气旋的跟踪误差在初始时间和预报的24小时使用荷兰涡旋进行的模型模拟中较小。与荷兰涡旋相比,带有兰金旋涡的2002年11月气旋的结果显示出更大的垂直风速。但是,对于2002年11月的气旋,两次实验的降水空间分布均无显着差异。为了为一个良好的统计样本提供足够数量的案例研究,本研究在印度地区扩展了三个附加气旋。此处研究的所有四个旋风表明,就最低海平面压力和最大风速而言,荷兰涡旋产生了更强的旋风。在2005年11月的气旋的24小时预报中,荷兰涡在纵向高度部分的风速垂直结构更好,而其余两个气旋的朗肯涡的结构更好。对应于所有四个旋风的两个实验的降水空间分布没有显着差异。提供了有关所有四个旋风的一些统计结果,例如平均航迹误差以及观测到的和模型的最小海平面压力和最大风速之间的平均差。与四个旋风的平均值相对应的统计结果与与2002年11月的旋风相对应的结果仅略有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号