...
首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series. Monetary Economics >MONETARY INTERVENTION MITIGATED BANKING PANICS DURING THE GREAT DEPRESSION: QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM THE FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT BORDER IN MISSISSIPPI, 1929 TO 1933
【24h】

MONETARY INTERVENTION MITIGATED BANKING PANICS DURING THE GREAT DEPRESSION: QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM THE FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT BORDER IN MISSISSIPPI, 1929 TO 1933

机译:大萧条期间的货币干预缓解了银行恐慌:1929年至1933年密西西比州联邦储备区边界的准实验证据

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 divided Mississippi between the 6th (Atlanta) and 8th (St. Louis) Federal Reserve Districts. Before and during the Great Depression, these districts' policies differed. The Atlanta Fed championed monetary activism and the extension of credit to troubled banks. The St. Louis Fed adhered to the doctrine of real bills and eschewed expansionary initiatives. Outcomes differed across districts. In the 6th District, banks failed at lower rates than in the 8th District, particularly during the banking panic in the fall of 1930. The pattern suggests that discount lending reduced failure rates during periods of panic. Historical evidence and statistical analysis corroborates this conclusion.
机译:1913年的《联邦储备法案》将密西西比州划分为第6(亚特兰大)和第8(圣路易斯)联邦储备区。大萧条之前和期间,这些地区的政策有所不同。亚特兰大联储倡导货币激进主义,并向陷入困境的银行提供信贷支持。圣路易斯联储局坚持实际法案的原则,并避免采取扩张性举措。结果因地区而异。在第六区,银行的失败率低于第八区,特别是在1930年秋季的银行恐慌期间。这种模式表明,折扣贷款降低了恐慌时期的失败率。历史证据和统计分析证实了这一结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号