...
首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series. Monetary Economics >Flight to Quality and Collective Risk Management
【24h】

Flight to Quality and Collective Risk Management

机译:走向质量和集体风险管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We present a model of flight to quality episodes that emphasizes systemic risk and the Knightian uncertainty surrounding these episodes. Agents make risk management decisions with incomplete knowledge. They understand their own shocks, but are uncertain of how correlated their shocks are with systemwide shocks. Aversion to this uncertainty leads them to question whether their private risk management decisions are robust to aggregate events, generating conservatism and excessive demand for safety. We show that agents' actions lock-up the capital of the financial system in a manner that is wasteful in the aggregate and can trigger and amplify a financial accelerator. The scenario that the collective of conservative agents are guarding against is impossible, and known to be so even given agents' incomplete knowledge. A lender of last resort, even if less knowledgeable than private agents about individual shocks, does not suffer from this collective bias and finds that pledging intervention in extreme events is valuable. The benefit of such intervention exceeds its direct value because it unlocks private capital markets.
机译:我们提出了一种向高质量事件飞行的模型,该模型强调系统性风险和围绕这些事件的Knightian不确定性。代理人不完全了解风险管理决策。他们了解自己的冲击,但不确定其冲击与系统范围的冲击之间的关联。对这种不确定性的厌恶使他们质疑他们的私人风险管理决策是否对汇总事件,生成保守主义和对安全的过度需求是否有力。我们表明,代理人的行为以一种浪费的方式锁定了金融系统的资本,这些资本在总体上是浪费的,并且可以触发和放大金融加速器。保守的特工团体要防备的情况是不可能的,而且即使特工的知识不完整也是如此。即使与私人代理人相比,最后贷款人对个人冲击的了解程度也不高,但也不会遭受这种集体偏见的困扰,并发现承诺对极端事件进行干预是很有价值的。这种干预的好处超过了其直接价值,因为它可以释放私人资本市场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号