...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Alternative approaches for better municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India
【24h】

Alternative approaches for better municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India

机译:印度孟买改善城市固体废物管理的替代方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Waste is an unavoidable by product of human activities. Economic development, urbanization and improving living standards in cities, have led to an increase in the quantity and complexity of generated waste. Rapid growth of population and industrialization degrades the urban environment and places serious stress on natural resources, which undermines equitable and sustainable development. Inefficient management and disposal of solid waste is an obvious cause of degradation of the environment in most cities of the developing world. Municipal corporations of the developing countries are not able to handle increasing quantities of waste, which results in uncol-lected waste on roads and in other public places. There is a need to work towards a sustainable waste management system, which requires environmental, institutional, financial, economic and social sustainability. This study explores alternative approaches to municipal solid waste (MSW) management and estimates the cost of waste management in Mumbai, India. Two alternatives considered in the paper are community participation and public private partnership in waste management. Data for the present study are from various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and from the private sector involved in waste management in Mumbai. Mathematical models are used to estimate the cost per ton of waste management for both of the alternatives, which are compared with the cost of waste management by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM). It is found that the cost per ton of waste management is. 1518 Rupees (35 US dollars) with community participation; 1797 Rupees (41 US dollars) with public private partnership (PPP); and Rupees. 1908 (44 US dollars) when only MCGM handles the waste. Hence, community participation in waste management is the least cost option and there is a strong case for comprehensively involving community participation in waste management.
机译:废物是人类活动不可避免的副产品。经济发展,城市化和城市生活水平的提高,导致产生的废物数量和复杂性增加。人口的迅速增长和工业化使城市环境恶化,并给自然资源带来了巨大压力,这破坏了公平和可持续的发展。在发展中国家的大多数城市中,固体废物的低效率管理和处置显然是导致环境恶化的原因。发展中国家的市政公司无法处理越来越多的废物,这导致道路和其他公共场所的废物很少。有必要努力建立一个可持续的废物管理系统,该系统需要环境,体制,财务,经济和社会的可持续性。这项研究探索了城市固体废物(MSW)管理的替代方法,并估计了印度孟买的废物管理成本。本文考虑的两种选择是废物管理中的社区参与和公私合作。本研究的数据来自各个非政府组织和参与孟买废物管理的私营部门。使用数学模型来估算这两种替代方案的每吨废物管理成本,并将其与大孟买市政公司(MCGM)的废物管理成本进行比较。发现每吨废物管理的成本是。 1518卢比(35美元),有社区参与; 1797卢比(41美元),与公私合营(PPP);和卢比。 1908年(44美元),当时只有MCGM处理废物。因此,社区参与废物管理是成本最低的选择,并且有充分的理由使社区参与废物管理成为可能。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2006年第10期|p.1192-1200|共9页
  • 作者

    S. Rathi;

  • 作者单位

    International Research Institute for Climate Prediction, The Earth Institute, Columbia University, 61 Rt. 9W, Monell, Palisades, NY 10964, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 废物处理与综合利用;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号