...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >An environmental analysis for comparing waste management options and strategies
【24h】

An environmental analysis for comparing waste management options and strategies

机译:用于比较废物管理方案和策略的环境分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The debate on different waste management practices has become an issue of utmost importance as human activities have overloaded the assimilative capacity of the biosphere. Recent Italian law on solid waste management recommends an increase in material recycling and energy recovery, and only foresees landfill disposal for inert materials and residues from recovery and recycling. A correct waste management policy should be based on the principles of sustainable development, according to which our refuse is not simply regarded as something to eliminate but rather as a potential resource. This requires the creation of an integrated waste management plan that makes full use of all available technologies. In this context, eMergy analysis is applied to evaluate three different forms of waste treatment and construct an approach capable of assessing the whole strategy of waste management. The evaluation included how much investment is needed for each type of waste management and how much "utility" is extracted from wastes, through the use of two indicators: Environmental yield ratio (EYR) and Net eMergy. Our results show that landfill is the worst system in terms of eMergy costs and eMergy benefits. Composting is the most efficient system in recovering eMergy (highest EYR) from municipal solid waste (MSW) while incineration is capable of saving the greatest quantity of eMergy per gram of MSW (highest net eMergy). This analysis has made it possible to assess the sustainability and the efficiency of individual options but could also be used to assess a greater environmental strategy for waste management, considering a system that might include landfills, incineration, composting, etc.
机译:随着人类活动使生物圈的同化能力超负荷,关于不同废物管理做法的辩论已成为最重要的问题。意大利最近有关固体废物管理的法律建议增加材料的回收利用和能量回收,并且仅预见将填埋处理惰性材料和来自回收和再循环的残留物的垃圾填埋场。正确的废物管理政策应基于可持续发展的原则,根据该原则,我们的垃圾不仅被简单地视为要消除的东西,而是被视为潜在资源。这就需要创建一个综合废物管理计划,该计划要充分利用所有可用技术。在这种情况下,eMergy分析可用于评估三种不同形式的废物处理,并构建一种能够评估废物管理整体策略的方法。评估包括通过使用两个指标:环境产量比(EYR)和净能源,对每种废物管理需要多少投资,以及从废物中提取了多少“效用”。我们的结果表明,就电子能源成本和电子能源收益而言,垃圾填埋场是最差的系统。堆肥是从城市固体废物(MSW)中回收eMergy(最高EYR)的最有效系统,而焚烧能够每克MSW(最高净eMergy)节省最多的eMergy。该分析使评估单个选择的可持续性和效率成为可能,但考虑到可能包括垃圾填埋场,焚化,堆肥等的系统,也可用于评估废物管理的更大环境策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号