...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Environmental assessment of incinerator residue utilisation
【24h】

Environmental assessment of incinerator residue utilisation

机译:焚烧炉残渣利用的环境评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Incineration ashes may be treated either as a waste to be dumped in landfill, or as a resource that is suitable for re-use. In order to choose the best management scenario, knowledge is needed on the potential environmental impact that may be expected, including not only local, but also regional and global impact. In this study, A life cycle assessment (LCA) based approach was outlined for environmental assessment of incinerator residue utilisation, in which leaching of trace elements as well as other emissions to air and water and the use of resources were regarded as constituting the potential environmental impact from the system studied. Case studies were performed for two selected ash types, bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) and wood fly ash. The MSWI bottom ash was assumed to be suitable for road construction or as drainage material in landfill, whereas the wood fly ash was assumed to be suitable for road construction or as a nutrient resource to be recycled on forest land after biofuel harvesting. Different types of potential environmental impact predominated in the activities of the system and the use of natural resources and the trace element leaching were identified as being relatively important for the scenarios compared. The scenarios differed in use of resources and energy, whereas there is a potential for trace element leaching regardless of how the material is managed. Utilising MSWI bottom ash in road construction and recycling of wood ash on forest land saved more natural resources and energy than when these materials were managed according to the other scenarios investigated, including dumping in landfill.
机译:焚烧骨灰既可以当作废物倾倒入垃圾填埋场,也可以当作适合再利用的资源处理。为了选择最佳管理方案,需要了解可能预期的潜在环境影响,不仅包括本地影响,还包括区域和全球影响。在这项研究中,概述了基于生命周期评估(LCA)的方法来进行焚烧炉残渣利用的环境评估,其中,微量元素的浸出以及空气和水的其他排放以及资源的使用被认为构成了潜在的环境受研究系统的影响。对两种选定的灰类型进行了案例研究,分别是城市固体废物焚烧(MSWI)的底灰和木粉煤灰。 MSWI底灰被认为适合道路建设或用作垃圾掩埋场的排水材料,而木粉煤灰被认为适合道路建设或作为生物燃料收获后在林地上循环再利用的养分资源。在系统活动以及自然资源的使用和微量元素浸出中占主导地位的不同类型的潜在环境影响被认为对于所比较的情景而言相对重要。场景在资源和能源的使用方面有所不同,而无论如何管理材料,都有可能进行微量元素的浸出。与根据其他调查方案(包括垃圾填埋场)对这些材料进行管理相比,在道路建设中使用MSWI底灰和在林地中回收木灰可节省更多的自然资源和能源。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2009年第7期|2071-2077|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Ecoloop AB, Mosebacke Torg 4. 116 46 Stockholm, Sweden Department of Land and Water Resources Engineering, KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden;

    Ecoloop AB, Mosebacke Torg 4. 116 46 Stockholm, Sweden;

    Department of Land and Water Resources Engineering, KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden;

    Ecoloop AB, Mosebacke Torg 4. 116 46 Stockholm, Sweden;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号