...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Life-cycle-assessment of the historical development of air pollution control and energy recovery in waste incineration
【24h】

Life-cycle-assessment of the historical development of air pollution control and energy recovery in waste incineration

机译:废物焚烧中空气污染控制和能量回收的历史发展的生命周期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Incineration of municipal solid waste is a debated waste management technology. In some countries it is the main waste management option whereas in other countries it has been disregarded. The main discussion point on waste incineration is the release of air emissions from the combustion of the waste, but also the energy recovery efficiency has a large importance. The historical development of air pollution control in waste incineration was studied through life-cycle-assessment modelling of eight different air pollution control technologies. The results showed a drastic reduction in the release of air emissions and consequently a significant reduction in the potential environmental impacts of waste incineration. Improvements of a factor 0.85-174 were obtained in the different impact potentials as technology developed from no emission control at all. to the best available emission control technologies of today (2010). The importance of efficient energy recovery was studied through seven different combinations of heat and electricity recovery, which were modelled to substitute energy produced from either coal or natural gas. The best air pollution control technology was used at the incinerator. It was found that when substituting coal based energy production total net savings were obtained in both the standard and toxic impact categories. However, if the substituted energy production was based on natural gas. only the most efficient recovery options yielded net savings with respect to the standard impacts. With regards to the toxic impact categories, emissions from the waste incineration process were always larger than those from the avoided energy production based on natural gas. The results shows that the potential environmental impacts from air emissions have decreased drastically during the last 35 years and that these impacts can be partly or fully offset by recovering energy which otherwise should have been produced from fossil fuels like coal or natural gas.
机译:焚化城市固体废物是一种有争议的废物管理技术。在某些国家,这是主要的废物管理方案,而在另一些国家,则被忽略。废物焚化的主要讨论点是废物燃烧释放出的空气排放,而且能量回收效率也非常重要。通过对八种不同空气污染控制技术的生命周期评估模型,研究了垃圾焚烧中空气污染控制的历史发展。结果表明,空气排放的释放量大大减少,因此,垃圾焚烧的潜在环境影响显着降低。从根本上没有排放控制的技术发展而来,在不同的冲击潜力下,系数提高了0.85-174。达到当今(2010年)可用的最佳排放控制技术。通过七种不同的热电回收组合研究了有效能源回收的重要性,这些组合被建模为替代从煤炭或天然气中产生的能源。焚烧炉采用了最佳的空气污染控制技术。研究发现,用煤替代能源生产可以在标准和有毒影响类别中获得总的净节约。但是,如果替代能源生产基于天然气。就标准影响而言,只有最有效的恢复方案才能带来净节省。关于毒性影响类别,废物焚化过程的排放总是大于避免使用天然气生产能源的排放。结果表明,在过去的35年中,空气排放对环境的潜在影响已大大减少,并且这些影响可以通过回收能源来部分或完全抵消,而这些能源本来应该由化石燃料(例如煤或天然气)产生。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2010年第7期|1244-1250|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Miljoevej, Building 113. DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby. Denmark;

    Ramboll, Consulting Engineers, Teknikerbyen 37, DK-2830 Virum, Denmark;

    Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Miljoevej, Building 113. DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby. Denmark;

    Ramboll, Consulting Engineers, Teknikerbyen 37, DK-2830 Virum, Denmark;

    Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Miljoevej, Building 113. DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby. Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号