...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >A life cycle assessment framework for large-scale changes in material circularity
【24h】

A life cycle assessment framework for large-scale changes in material circularity

机译:用于材料圆形大规模变化的生命周期评估框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Increasing material circularity is high on the agenda of the European Union in order to decouple environmental impacts and economic growth. While life cycle assessment (LCA) is useful for quantifying the associated environmental impacts, consistent LCA modeling of the large-scale changes arising from policy targets addressing material circularity (i.e., recycled content and recycling rate) is challenging. In response to this, we propose an assessment framework addressing key steps in LCA, namely, goal definition, functional unit, baseline versus alternative scenario definition, and modeling of system responses. Regulatory and economic aspects (e.g., trends in consumption patterns, market responses, market saturation, and legislative side-policies affecting waste management) are emphasized as critical for the identification of potential system responses and for supporting regulatory interventions required to reach the intended environmental benefits. The framework is recommended for LCA studies focusing on system-wide consequences where allocation between product life cycles is not relevant; however, the framework can be adapted to include allocation. The application of the framework was illustrated by an example of implementing a policy target for 2025 of 70% recycled content in PET trays in EU27+1. It was demonstrated that neglecting large-scale market responses and saturation lead to an over-estimation of the environmental benefits from the policy target and that supplementary initiatives are required to achieve the full benefits at system level.
机译:在欧洲联盟的议程中,增加材料圆形是高度脱钩的环境影响和经济增长。虽然生命周期评估(LCA)对于量化相关的环境影响是有用的,但一致的LCA建模,从政策目标寻址材料循环(即再循环内容和回收率)是挑战性的。响应于此,我们提出了一种评估框架解决LCA中的关键步骤,即目标定义,功能单元,基线与替代方案定义以及系统响应的建模。强调监管和经济方面(例如,影响废物管理的消费模式,市场反应,市场饱和度和立法侧政策的趋势)对潜在制度答复的识别和支持达到预期环境效益所需的监管干预措施至关重要。推荐框架用于LCA研究,重点关注系统寿命周期之间分配不相关的系统范围的后果;但是,框架可以适于包括分配。通过在EU27 + 1中的PET托盘中实施2025%的70%再循环含量的政策靶标的实例来说明该框架的应用。有人证明,忽视大规模的市场反应和饱和导致对政策目标的环境效益的过度估计,并且需要补充举措来实现系统级别的全部利益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2021年第11期|360-371|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark Bygningstorvet Bygoing 115 DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby Denmark European Commission Joint Research Centre Edificio Expo Calle Inca Garcilaso 3 41092 Seville Spain;

    European Commission Joint Research Centre Edificio Expo Calle Inca Garcilaso 3 41092 Seville Spain;

    Division of Environmental Systems Analysis Chalmers University of Technology 412 96 Goeteborg Sweden;

    Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark Bygningstorvet Bygoing 115 DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Circular economy; Environmental assessment; PET trays; Policy targets; Recycling;

    机译:循环经济;环境评估;宠物托盘;政策目标;回收;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号