...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >The economic efficiency of the co-digestion at WWTPs: A full-scale study
【24h】

The economic efficiency of the co-digestion at WWTPs: A full-scale study

机译:WWTPS共同消化的经济效率:全规模研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The methane and digestate production from biowaste (BW, 95% food waste and 5% garden waste based on fresh mass) and grease trap sludge (GTS) co-digestion at the Grossache-Nord WWTP (Austria) as a basis for a cost-benefit analysis was determined using two approaches: The first one was to determine the specific methane yields (SMY) and total solids (TS) removals (%) of the used substrates in biomethane potential (BMP) tests. In the second, the full-scale process data from a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system were analyzed. From these data, the SMY of the sewage sludge (SS) was calculated for a period without co-digestion and applied to the study period. Thus, it was possible to calculate the methane and digestate production from the co-substrates. Both approaches produced different co-substrate SMYs and TS degradation results. In the approach using the BMP, the SMY was 518 m~3/t TS_(added) and the TS degradation was 77%. For the full-scale method, these values were found to be 620 m~3/t TS_(added) and 66%, respectively. However, the cost-benefit analysis of both approaches indicated that electricity generation from co-digestion can cover the associated costs. The benefit to cost ratio was 1.14 and 1.08 for the BMP and full-scale approach, respectively. The application of the respective approach depends on the availability and quality of full-scale process SCADA data.
机译:从Biowashe(BW,95%的食物垃圾和5%庭院废物的消化生产,并在Grossache-Nord WWTP(奥地利)的润滑脂陷阱污泥(GTS)共消化为成本 - 利用两种方法测定益处分析:第一个是确定特定的甲烷产率(Smy)和总固体(TS)除去(%)的生物甲烷电位(BMP)试验中的底物。第二,分析了来自监督控制和数据采集(SCADA)系统的全规模过程数据。根据这些数据,污水污泥(SS)的SMY计算在没有共消化并应用于研究期间的期间。因此,可以计算甲烷并从共衬底消化产生。两种方法都产生了不同的共衬底SMY和TS降解结果。在使用BMP的方法中,SMY为518 m〜3 / t TS_(加入),TS降解为77%。对于满量程方法,发现这些值分别为620 m〜3 / t Ts_(已添加)和66%。然而,两种方法的成本效益分析表明,来自共消化的发电可以涵盖相关成本。为BMP和全规模方法分别为成本比的益处为1.14和1.08。各自方法的应用取决于全规模过程SCADA数据的可用性和质量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2021年第9期|110-118|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Unit of Environmental Engineering Department of Infrastructure University of Innsbruck Technikerstrqsse 13 6020 Innsbruck Austria;

    Unit of Environmental Engineering Department of Infrastructure University of Innsbruck Technikerstrqsse 13 6020 Innsbruck Austria;

    Unit of Environmental Engineering Department of Infrastructure University of Innsbruck Technikerstrqsse 13 6020 Innsbruck Austria;

    Unit of Environmental Engineering Department of Infrastructure University of Innsbruck Technikerstrqsse 13 6020 Innsbruck Austria;

    Unit of Environmental Engineering Department of Infrastructure University of Innsbruck Technikerstrqsse 13 6020 Innsbruck Austria;

    Unit of Environmental Engineering Department of Infrastructure University of Innsbruck Technikerstrqsse 13 6020 Innsbruck Austria;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Cost-benefit analysis; Anaerobic co-digestion; Wastewater treatment plant; Sewage sludge; Biomethane potential; Food waste;

    机译:成本效益分析;厌氧共消化;污水处理厂;污水污泥;生物甲烷潜力;食物浪费;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号