...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Cost-benefit analysis for recycling of agricultural wastes in Taiwan
【24h】

Cost-benefit analysis for recycling of agricultural wastes in Taiwan

机译:台湾农业废物回收的成本效益分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Agricultural waste can be recycled in different ways. Cost-effectiveness is important information for investment decision-making of enterprises and policy-making of government to choose a profitable way to recycle agricultural waste. Therefore, this paper aims to present a cost-benefit analysis to assess and compare the cost-effectiveness between feasible recycling methods, and further propose cost-effective ways for recycling agricultural waste in Taiwan. Three recycling types of agricultural wastes, namely, composting, biogas power generation and biomass fuel are selected for cost-benefit analysis based on related regulations and policy supports of agricultural waste management in Taiwan. Primary data collected by sampling surveys conducted in 2018 supplemented by secondary data from national statistics are used for this study. Study results show that all three recycling types of agricultural wastes discussed in this study are profitable under corresponding economic conditions in 2018 with benefit/cost ratio greater than 1 and positive net present value; as expected, the cost-effectiveness of agricultural waste recycling varies depending on the recycling types, composition of input materials, and economic scales. Mixing chicken manure with other agricultural wastes for composting and using rice straw to make biomass fuel rods are estimated to have higher cost-effectiveness: livestock farms with small farming scale have relatively low biogas energy recovery efficiency; the cost-effectiveness of biogas power generation highly depends on fixed-in tariffs (FITs). Results imply that policy support for establishing co-processing centers of agricultural waste and differentiated FITs would be good measures to stimulate recycling efficiency of agricultural waste in Taiwan.
机译:农业废物可以以不同的方式再循环。成本效益是企业的投资决策和政府政策的重要信息,以选择盈利方式来回收农业垃圾。因此,本文旨在提出成本效益分析,以评估可行回收方法之间的成本效益,并进一步提出了在台湾回收农业废物的经济有效途径。三种回收类型的农业废物,即堆肥,沼气发电和生物质燃料,基于台湾农业废物管理的相关规定和政策支持的成本效益分析。 2018年通过来自国家统计数据的二级数据进行的抽样调查收集的主要数据用于本研究。研究结果表明,这项研究中讨论的所有三种农业废物类型都在2018年的相应经济条件下盈利,福利/成本比率大于1和正净目的价值;正如预期的那样,农业废物回收的成本效益根据回收类型,输入材料的组成和经济尺度而变化。将鸡肉粪便与其他农业废物堆肥和利用稻草制作生物质燃料棒估计具有更高的成本效益:畜牧业的畜牧业具有相对较低的沼气能量回收效率;沼气发电的成本效益高度取决于固定关税(适合)。结果暗示为建立农业废物和差异化的共同处理中心的政策支持将是促进台湾农业废物的回收效率的良好措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号