...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Best-compromise solutions for waste management: Decision support system for policymaking
【24h】

Best-compromise solutions for waste management: Decision support system for policymaking

机译:废物管理的最佳妥协解决方案:决策支持系统为决策制定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Proper management of urban waste might support sustainable and circular development, while mismanagement increases both costs and socio-environmental negative outcomes. In particular, the organic fraction constitutes the largest share of urban waste. In the circular economy framework, it is described as a valuable resource, to be converted into soil improver, biogas and energy. The aim of the paper is to propose a Decision Support System (DSS) for policymakers, based on linear programming techniques. This model is expected to improve the current methodologies for planning and managing organic fraction of municipal solid waste and provide useful insights about public resources allocation. The proposed optimization model is tested on Campania Region (Italy), which is a clear example of the negative implications of improper waste management. Based on the goals recently set by Campania regional government, the model allows to select the most cost-effective and sustainable solutions for treating organic waste. Results show three different scenarios associated to the impacts that each possible outcome has on the stated objectives. The "Ideal Solution" is not achievable, but it is used as a benchmark; the "Max NPV Solution" is feasible, but it reports several major drawbacks. Finally, the "Best Compromise Solution" allows to increase regional composting capability by six time and biogas availability by seven times, with environmental implications that are very similar to the ideal ones.
机译:适当管理城市废物可能支持可持续和循环的发展,而管理不善增加成本和社会环境负面结果。特别是,有机部分构成城市浪费的最大份额。在循环经济框架中,它被描述为有价值的资源,被转化为土壤改良剂,沼气和能量。本文的目的是基于线性规划技术提出决策支持系统(DSS)为政策制定者。预计该模型将改善目前的规划和管理市政固体废物的有机分数的方法,并为公共资源分配提供有用的见解。在坎帕尼亚地区(意大利)测试了所提出的优化模型,这是不正确的废物管理的负面影响的一个明显例子。基于坎帕尼亚区域政府最近设定的目标,该模型允许为治疗有机废物选择最具成本效益和可持续的解决方案。结果显示了与每个可能结果对规定的目标相关的三种不同情景。 “理想解决方案”是无法实现的,但它被用作基准; “MAX NPV解决方案”是可行的,但报告了几个主要缺点。最后,“最佳妥协解决方案”允许将区域堆肥能力提高六次和沼气可用性七次,具有与理想的环境的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号