...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >A comparison of Waste Management throughout Asian countries
【24h】

A comparison of Waste Management throughout Asian countries

机译:整个亚洲国家的废物管理比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Thirty years ago, when I first became involved with solid waste management, waste management strategies applied in Japan (an Eastern country) and other developed countries (the West) differed considerably. Semi-aerobic landfill concepts, widely accepted as a standard structure in Japan, had not gained approval in the West; the source separation practised in Japan was not common in the West; high MSW incineration rates of up to 70 percent in Japan were viewed as exceptional throughout the rest of the world. However, this gap has been reduced in recent years. Forced aeration into old landfills is now an accepted technology used in promoting stabilization, and aerobic landfilling is a widely applied option in the Bioreactor concept of landfilling technology. Source separation of biowaste and combustible waste is considered necessary in the recovery of material and/or energy, and incineration is now carried out on a much higher proportion of waste in the West. What is the explanation for this?
机译:30年前,当我第一次涉足固体废物管理时,日本(东部国家)和其他发达国家(西部)所采用的废物管理策略存在很大差异。半好氧掩埋概念在日本已被广泛接受为标准结构,但在西方尚未获得批准。日本实行的源头分离在西方并不普遍。在世界其他地方,日本最高70%的MSW焚烧率被认为是例外。但是,近年来这种差距已经缩小。强制通风到旧的垃圾填埋场现在已成为促进稳定化的公认技术,而好氧垃圾填埋是生物反应器垃圾填埋技术概念中广泛应用的选择。在回收材料和/或能源时,认为必须对生物废物和可燃废物进行源头分离,并且在西方国家,现在对焚化的废物比例要高得多。这有什么解释?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2014年第6期|969-970|共2页
  • 作者

    Toshihiko Matsuto;

  • 作者单位

    Laboratory of Solid Waste Disposal Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Japan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号