...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management
【24h】

Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management

机译:建筑和拆迁废物管理的生命周期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Life cycle assessment (LCA) modelling of construction and demolition waste (C&DW) management was carried out. The functional unit was management of 1 Mg mineral, source separated C&DW, which is either utilised in road construction as a substitute for natural aggregates, or landfilled. The assessed environmental impacts included both non-toxic and toxic impact categories. The scenarios comprised all stages of the end-of-life management of C&DW, until final disposal of all residues. Leaching of inorganic contaminants was included, as was the production of natural aggregates, which was avoided because of the use of C&DW. Typical uncertainties related to contaminant leaching were addressed. For most impact categories, utilisation of C&DW in road construction was preferable to landfilling; however, for most categories, utilisation resulted in net environmental burdens. Transportation represented the most important contribution for most nontoxic impacts, accounting for 60-95 per cent of these impacts. Capital goods contributed with negligible impacts. Leaching played a critical role for the toxic categories, where landfilling had lower impacts than utilisation because of the lower levels of leachate per ton of C&DW reaching the groundwater over a 100-year perspective. Leaching of oxyanions (As, V and Sb) was critical with respect to leaching. Typical experimental uncertainties in leaching data did not have a pivotal influence on the results; however, accounting for Cr immobilisation in soils as part of the impact assessment was critical for modelling the leaching impacts. Compared with the overall life cycle of building and construction materials, leaching emissions were shown to be potentially significant for toxicity impacts, compared with contributions from production of the same materials, showing that end-of-life impacts and leaching should not be disregarded when assessing environmental impacts from construction products and materials. CO_2 uptake in the C&DW corresponding to 15 per cent carbonation could out-balance global warming impacts from transportation; however, carbonation would also likely result in increased toxicity impacts due to higher leaching of oxyanions.
机译:对建筑和拆迁废物(C&DW)管理进行了生命周期评估(LCA)建模。功能单元是管理1 Mg矿物,分离源C&DW,该C&DW可用于道路建设以替代天然骨料,也可以填埋。评估的环境影响包括无毒和有毒影响类别。方案包括C&DW报废管理的所有阶段,直到最终清除所有残留物。包括无机污染物的浸出,以及天然骨料的浸出,由于使用了C&DW,因此避免了这种浸出。解决了与污染物浸出有关的典型不确定性。对于大多数影响类别,在道路建设中使用C&DW优于填埋。但是,对于大多数类别,利用造成了净环境负担。运输是对大多数无毒影响的最重要贡献,占这些影响的60-95%。资本货物的影响可忽略不计。浸出对于有毒类别起着至关重要的作用,因为在100年的时间里,每吨C&DW渗入地下水的渗滤液水平较低,因此填埋的影响要比利用低。含氧阴离子(As,V和Sb)的浸出对于浸出至关重要。浸出数据中典型的实验不确定性对结果没有关键影响。然而,将铬固定在土壤中作为影响评估的一部分,对于模拟浸出影响至关重要。与建筑材料的整个生命周期相比,浸出排放对于毒性影响具有潜在的重大意义,与相同材料生产的贡献相比,表明在评估时不应忽略寿命终了的影响和浸出建筑产品和材料对环境的影响。相当于15%碳酸化程度的C&DW中的CO_2吸收量可能会抵消运输带来的全球变暖影响;但是,碳酸化也可能由于较高的氧阴离子的浸出而导致毒性增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号