...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >A review of technologies and performances of thermal treatment systems for energy recovery from waste
【24h】

A review of technologies and performances of thermal treatment systems for energy recovery from waste

机译:从废物中回收能量的热处理系统的技术和性能综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this work is to identify the current level of energy recovery through waste thermal treatment. The state of the art in energy recovery from waste was investigated, highlighting the differences for different types of thermal treatment, considering combustion/incineration, gasification and pyrolysis. Also different types of wastes - Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) or Solid Refuse Fuels (SRF) and some typologies of Industrial Waste (IW) (sludge, plastic scraps, etc.) - were included in the analysis. The investigation was carried out mainly reviewing papers, published in scientific journals and conferences, but also considering technical reports, to gather more information. In particular the goal of this review work was to synthesize studies in order to compare the values of energy conversion efficiencies measured or calculated for different types of thermal processes and different types of waste. It emerged that the dominant type of thermal treatment is incineration associated to energy recovery in a steam cycle. When waste gasification is applied, the produced syngas is generally combusted in a boiler to generate steam for energy recovery in a steam cycle. For both the possibilities - incineration or gasification - cogeneration is the mean to improve energy recovery, especially for small scale plants. In the case of only electricity production, the achievable values are strongly dependent on the plant size: for large plant size, where advanced technical solutions can be applied and sustained from an economic point of view, net electric efficiency may reach values up to 30-31%. In small-medium plants, net electric efficiency is constrained by scale effect and remains at values around 20-24%. Other types of technical solutions - gasification with syngas use in internally fired devices, pyrolysis and plasma gasification -are less common or studied at pilot or demonstrative scale and, in any case, offer at present similar or lower levels of energy efficiency.
机译:这项工作的目的是通过废热处理确定当前的能量回收水平。研究了从废物中回收能量的最新技术,强调了考虑到燃烧/焚化,气化和热解的不同类型热处理的差异。分析中还包括不同类型的废物-城市固体废物(MSW),垃圾衍生燃料(RDF)或固体垃圾燃料(SRF)以及某些类型的工业废物(IW)(污泥,塑料屑等)。 。调查主要是对发表在科学期刊和会议上的论文进行审查,还考虑了技术报告,以收集更多信息。特别是,这项审查工作的目的是综合研究,以便比较针对不同类型的热过程和不同类型的废物所测量或计算的能量转换效率的值。结果表明,热处理的主要类型是与蒸汽循环中的能量回收有关的焚烧。当进行废气气化时,产生的合成气通常在锅炉中燃烧以产生蒸汽以在蒸汽循环中回收能量。对于两种可能性-焚化或气化-热电联产都是提高能量回收率的手段,特别是对于小型工厂。在仅电力生产的情况下,可达到的值在很大程度上取决于工厂的规模:对于大型工厂,从经济的角度来看,可以应用并维持先进的技术解决方案并保持其稳定运行,则净电力效率可能达到30- 31%。在中小型工厂中,净电效率受到规模效应的限制,并保持在20-24%左右的值。其他类型的技术解决方案-在内部燃烧的设备中使用合成气进行气化,热解和等离子气化-很少见或在中试或示范规模上进行研究,并且在任何情况下,目前提供的能源效率都差不多或更低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号