...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >LCA of management strategies for RDF incineration and gasification bottom ash based on experimental leaching data
【24h】

LCA of management strategies for RDF incineration and gasification bottom ash based on experimental leaching data

机译:基于实验浸出数据的RDF焚烧气化底灰管理策略的生命周期评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The main characteristics and environmental properties of the bottom ash (BA) generated from thermal treatment of waste may vary significantly depending on the type of waste and thermal technology employed. Thus, to ensure that the strategies selected for the management of these residues do not cause adverse environmental impacts, the specific properties of BA, in particular its leaching behavior, should be taken into account. This study focuses on the evaluation of potential environmental impacts associated with two different management options for BA from thermal treatment of Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF): landfilling and recycling as a filler for road sub bases. Two types of thermal treatment were considered: incineration and gasification. Potential environmental impacts were evaluated by life-cycle assessment (LCA) using the EASETECH model. Both non-toxicity related impact categories (i.e. global warming and mineral abiotic resource depletion) and toxic impact categories (i.e. human toxicity and ecotoxicity) were assessed. The system boundaries included BA transport from the incineration/gasification plants to the landfills and road construction sites, leaching of potentially toxic metals from the BA, the avoided extraction, crushing, transport and leaching of virgin raw materials for the road scenarios, and material and energy consumption for the construction of the landfills. To provide a quantitative assessment of the leaching properties of the two types of BA, experimental leaching data were used to estimate the potential release from each of the two types of residues. Specific attention was placed on the sensitivity of leaching properties and the determination of emissions by leaching, including: leaching data selection, material properties and assumptions related to emission modeling. The LCA results showed that for both types of BA, landfilling was associated with the highest environmental impacts in the non-toxicity related categories. For the toxicity related categories, the two types of residues behaved differently. For incineration BA the contribution of metal leaching to the total impacts had a dominant role, with the highest environmental loads resulting for the road scenario. For the gasification BA, the opposite result was obtained, due to the lower release of contaminants observed for this material compared to incineration BA. Based on the results of this study, it may be concluded that, depending on the type of BA considered, its leaching behavior may significantly affect the results of a LCA regarding its management strategies.
机译:废物热处理产生的底灰(BA)的主要特性和环境特性可能会根据废物类型和所采用的热技术而发生显着变化。因此,为确保为处理这些残留物而选择的策略不会对环境造成不利影响,应考虑BA的特定特性,尤其是其浸出行为。这项研究的重点是评估与两种不同的BA替代管理方法相关的潜在环境影响,这些管理方法来自垃圾衍生燃料(RDF)的热处理:填埋和循环利用作为路基的填充料。考虑了两种热处理:焚化和气化。使用EASETECH模型通过生命周期评估(LCA)评估了潜在的环境影响。评估了与非毒性有关的影响类别(即全球变暖和矿物非生物资源枯竭)和有毒影响类别(即人类毒性和生态毒性)。系统边界包括从焚化/气化厂到填埋场和道路施工现场的BA运输,BA中潜在有毒金属的浸出,道路情况下避免的原始原材料的提取,压碎,运输和浸出以及材料和建造填埋场的能源消耗。为了提供对两种类型BA浸出特性的定量评估,使用了实验浸出数据来估计两种类型残渣中每一种的潜在释放量。特别关注浸出特性的敏感性和通过浸出确定排放量,包括:浸出数据选择,材料特性和与排放模型相关的假设。 LCA结果表明,对于两种类型的BA,填埋与无毒相关类别中对环境的影响最大。对于毒性相关类别,两种类型的残留物表现不同。对于焚烧BA,金属浸出对总影响的贡献起主要作用,道路情景导致最高的环境负荷。对于气化BA,获得相反的结果,这是因为与焚烧BA相比,该材料的污染物释放量更低。根据这项研究的结果,可以得出结论,根据所考虑的BA类型,其浸出行为可能会显着影响LCA的管理策略结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2016年第janaptab期|285-298|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy;

    Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy;

    Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy;

    Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 113, DK-2008 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark;

    Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy;

    Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 113, DK-2008 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Bottom ash; Refuse derived fuel; Gasification; Incineration; Life cycle assessment; Leaching;

    机译:底灰;拒绝衍生燃料;气化;焚化;生命周期评估;浸出;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号