...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Comparative study of ANN and RSM for simultaneous optimization of multiple targets in Fenton treatment of landfill leachate
【24h】

Comparative study of ANN and RSM for simultaneous optimization of multiple targets in Fenton treatment of landfill leachate

机译:Fenton处理垃圾渗滤液中ANN和RSM同时优化多个目标的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, two modeling methods, namely response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANN), were applied to investigate the Fenton process performance in landfill leachate treatment. For this purpose, three targets were used to cover different aspects of post-treatment products such as supernatant and sludge: mass content ratio (MCR) and mass removal efficiency (MRE). It was observed that coagulation was dominant mechanism in all responses. The proposed models were evaluated based on correlation coefficient (R~2), root mean square error (RMSE) and average error (AE) and both models seemed satisfactory. However, the better results of 0.97-0.98 for R~2,1.45-1.86 for RMSE and 2-4% for error, indicated relative superiority of ANN compared to RSM. In addition, it was revealed that [H_2O_2]/ [Fe~(2+)] mole ratio had the greatest effect in the targets, while Fe dosage and pH had lower ones. Finally, to investigate the predictive performance of both models, some additional experiments were conducted in expected optimum conditions that resulted to 27% sludge MCR, 14% effluent MCR, and 56% MRE. The results showed low deviation from predicted values with maximum errors of 8% and 9% for RSM and ANN, respectively. Though in most cases, ANN error values were lower than RSM values. Also, it was proved that setting RSM prior to ANN (as a feeding tool) improves the predictive capability of ANN significantly.
机译:在这项研究中,两种建模方法,即响应面方法(RSM)和人工神经网络(ANN),被用于研究Fenton工艺在垃圾渗滤液处理中的性能。为此,使用了三个目标来覆盖后处理产品的不同方面,例如上清液和污泥:质量含量比(MCR)和质量去除效率(MRE)。观察到凝血是所有反应的主要机制。基于相关系数(R〜2),均方根误差(RMSE)和平均误差(AE)对所提出的模型进行了评估,两个模型都令人满意。然而,RSE的R〜2、1.45-1.86的更好结果为0.97-0.98,误差为2-4%的更好结果表明,与RSM相比,ANN具有相对优势。另外,揭示了[H_2O_2] / [Fe〜(2+)]摩尔比对目标的影响最大,而Fe的用量和pH值较低。最后,为了研究这两种模型的预测性能,在预期的最佳条件下进行了一些额外的实验,这些实验产生了27%的污泥MCR,14%的废水MCR和56%的MRE。结果表明,与预测值的偏差较小,RSM和ANN的最大误差分别为8%和9%。尽管在大多数情况下,ANN错误值低于RSM值。此外,事实证明,在ANN之前设置RSM(作为一种进给工具)可以显着提高ANN的预测能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号