...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Environmental assessment of existing and alternative options for management of municipal solid waste in Brazil
【24h】

Environmental assessment of existing and alternative options for management of municipal solid waste in Brazil

机译:巴西城市生活垃圾管理现有方法和替代方法的环境评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to evaluate and compare three different categories of management systems for municipal solid waste (MSW) in Brazil: (1) mixed waste direct disposal systems, (2) separate collection systems, based on wet-dry streams, and (3) mixed waste mechanical-biological systems, including materials recovery. System scenarios were built around main treatment techniques available and applicable in developing countries, and considered barriers as well as potential synergies between waste management and other industrial production. In the first category systems, we measured the impact magnitude of improper disposal sites (semi-controlled and controlled dumps) still used for approximately 40% of collected MSW, and found that sanitary landfills could decrease it 3-5 fold (e.g. GWP, from 1100-1200 to 250-450 kg CO2 eq. t(-1) waste). As an alternative, waste incineration did not show significant benefits over sanitary landfilling, due to limitations in energy utilization and the low-carbon background electricity system. Category two of systems, revealed recycling benefits and the necessity as well as potential risks of biological treatment for wet streams. Simple wet-dry collection could result in relatively high levels of contamination in compost outputs, which should be mitigated by intensive pre- and post-treatment. Potential impact of air emissions from biological degradation processes was important even after anaerobic digestion processes. Biogas upgrading and use as vehicle fuel resulted in bigger savings compared to direct electricity production. Lastly, category three, mechanical-biological systems, displayed savings in most environmental impact categories, associated with materials recovery for recycling and refuse-derived fuel (RDF) production and utilization in cement manufacturing. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:生命周期评估(LCA)用于评估和比较巴西城市固体废物(MSW)的三种不同类别的管理系统:(1)混合废物直接处置系统,(2)基于干湿流的单独收集系统,以及(3)混合废物机械生物系统,包括物料回收。系统方案是围绕发展中国家可用并适用的主要处理技术建立的,并考虑了废物管理与其他工业生产之间的障碍以及潜在的协同作用。在第一类系统中,我们测量了仍用于约40%收集的城市固体废弃物的不当处置场所(半控制和可控制的垃圾场)的影响程度,发现卫生垃圾填埋场可以将其减少3-5倍(例如,全球变暖潜能值)。 1100-1200至250-450 kg CO2当量t(-1)废物)。作为替代方案,由于能源利用和低碳背景电力系统的局限性,垃圾焚烧没有比卫生垃圾填埋场显着受益。系统的第二类,显示了回收利用的好处,对湿流进行生物处理的必要性和潜在风险。简单的干湿收集可能会导致堆肥产品中较高水平的污染,应通过密集的预处理和后处理来减轻这种污染。即使经过厌氧消化过程,来自生物降解过程的空气排放的潜在影响也很重要。与直接发电相比,沼气的升级和用作车辆燃料可节省更多成本。最后,第三类机械-生物系统在大多数环境影响类别中均显示出节省,这与用于回收的材料回收以及水泥生产中的垃圾衍生燃料(RDF)生产和利用有关。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号