...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Techno-economic analyses of solid-state anaerobic digestion and composting of yard trimmings
【24h】

Techno-economic analyses of solid-state anaerobic digestion and composting of yard trimmings

机译:固体厌氧消化和堆肥堆肥的技术经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) and composting are two potential alternatives to divert yard trimmings from landfills. This study aimed to evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of commercial-scale SS-AD and composting systems (20,000 metric tons (MT)/year) that received both yard trimmings and liquid AD effluent using a modeling software, SuperPro Designer. Both the SS-AD and composting systems were shown to be economically feasible. While their revenues were comparable ($48/MT), SS-AD with digestate drying showed a higher capital cost ($256/MT vs. $84/MT) but a lower non-facility-dependent operating cost ($11/MT vs. $21/MT) than composting. The payback time, internal rate of return (IRR), and net present value (NPV) were estimated to be similar to 10 years, 8%, and $0.2 million, respectively, for SS-AD, and similar to 4.9 years, 33%, and $1.8 million, respectively, for composting. Digestate drying was necessary to make SS-AD profitable via the sale of byproduct, but it was also the most energy intensive step, relying on heat recovery to reduce costs. Moreover, the economics of SS-AD were highly improved (NPV $2 million) with financial incentives (i.e. investment tax credits), indicating that incentives were critical to the economic feasibility of current SS-AD systems that utilize lignocellulosic biomass. However, renewable identification numbers (RINs) and renewable energy certificates (RECs) had minor effects. Furthermore, the economics of both systems were most sensitive to plant size, tipping fees, and byproduct/compost price. The results suggest SS-AD may be favored for centralized management while composting for de-centralized management of yard trimmings. Alternative ways to valorize digestate should be evaluated in future studies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:固态厌氧消化(SS-AD)和堆肥是从堆填区转移院子修剪的两种潜在替代方法。这项研究旨在评估商业规模的SS-AD和堆肥系统(每年20,000公吨(MT))的技术经济可行性,该系统使用建模软件SuperPro Designer接收堆场修整和液态AD废水。 SS-AD和堆肥系统都被证明在经济上是可行的。虽然他们的收入相当(48美元/吨),但具有消化干燥的SS-AD的资本成本较高(256美元/吨,84美元/吨),而与设施无关的运营成本较低(11美元/吨,21美元/吨)。 MT)比堆肥。 SS-AD的投资回收期,内部收益率(IRR)和净现值(NPV)分别估计分别为10年,8%和20万美元,而相似的4.9年,33%为49%。 ,以及分别用于堆肥的180万美元。为了使SS-AD通过副产品销售获利,必须进行Digestate干燥,但这也是最耗能的步骤,依靠热量回收来降低成本。此外,通过财政激励措施(即投资税收抵免),SS-AD的经济性得到了极大提高(NPV为200万美元),这表明激励措施对于当前利用木质纤维素生物质的SS-AD系统的经济可行性至关重要。但是,可再生标识号(RINs)和可再生能源证书(RECs)的影响较小。此外,两种系统的经济性对工厂规模,倾卸费和副产品/堆肥价格最敏感。结果表明,SS-AD可能更适合于集中管理,而堆肥则有利于院子装饰物的去中心化管理。在以后的研究中应评估替代消化的方法。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2019年第2期|405-416|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Ohio State Univ, Ohio Agr Res & Dev Ctr, Dept Food Agr & Biol Engn, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster, OH 44691 USA|Ohio State Univ, Environm Sci Grad Program, 3138A Smith Lab,174 West 18th, Columbus, OH 43210 USA;

    Ohio State Univ, Ohio Agr Res & Dev Ctr, Dept Food Agr & Biol Engn, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster, OH 44691 USA|Ohio State Univ, Environm Sci Grad Program, 3138A Smith Lab,174 West 18th, Columbus, OH 43210 USA;

    Ohio State Univ, Ohio Agr Res & Dev Ctr, Dept Food Agr & Biol Engn, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster, OH 44691 USA;

    Ohio State Univ, Ohio Agr Res & Dev Ctr, Dept Food Agr & Biol Engn, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster, OH 44691 USA|Quasar Energy Grp, 8600 E Pleast Valley Rd, Independence, OH 44131 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Techno-economic analysis; Yard trimmings; Solid-state anaerobic digestion; Composting; Incentives;

    机译:技术经济分析;堆场修剪;固态厌氧消化;堆肥;激励措施;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号