...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Financial feasibility of waste to energy strategies in the United Arab Emirates
【24h】

Financial feasibility of waste to energy strategies in the United Arab Emirates

机译:阿拉伯联合酋长国废物转化能源战略的财务可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The present research explores the financial feasibility of alternative waste management strategies, based on waste to energy, in the United Arab Emirates. The integrated strategies assessed in this study were primarily based on anaerobic digestion (AD) or incineration. The economics of both strategies were evaluated based on various revenue and cost streams, as well as multiple financial parameters over a 20-year period. Carbon credits were estimated based on the projected carbon emission reductions from each strategy. Realistic public participation and recovery rates for waste separation and recycling were applied. It was found that the incineration strategy is profitable with a net present value of 181 million USD, compared to −127 million USD for the AD strategy. The incineration strategy was more financially favorable in terms of the payback period, internal rate of return and profitability index, mainly due to the larger amount of processed waste. On the other hand, the AD was substantially affected by the landfilling cost of the produced digestate as well as the low participation rate in the proposed food waste separation program. The levelized cost of electricity for incineration and AD was 0.096 and 0.101 USD/kWh, respectively. The incineration and AD strategies were found to breakeven at a minimum of 52.4 and 31.2 million tons of processed waste, respectively. Certain legislative and social modifications made the AD strategy financially feasible. The sensitivity analysis showed that the net present values of both strategies were strongly affected by the variations in capital investments, landfilling costs, and electricity tariff.
机译:本研究探讨了在阿拉伯联合酋长国基于废物转化为能源的替代废物管理策略的财务可行性。本研究中评估的综合策略主要基于厌氧消化(AD)或焚烧。根据各种收入和成本流以及20年期间的多种财务参数,评估了这两种策略的经济性。碳信用额是根据每种策略的预计碳减排量估算的。应用了实际的公众参与和废物分类和回收利用的回收率。结果发现,焚烧策略可实现盈利,其净现值为1.81亿美元,而AD策略则为-1.27亿美元。就投资回收期,内部收益率和获利能力指标而言,焚烧策略在财务上更为有利,这主要是由于处理后的废物量较大。另一方面,AD很大程度上受到生产的消化液的垃圾掩埋成本以及拟议的食物垃圾分类计划参与率低的影响。焚烧和垃圾焚烧的平均电费分别为0.096和0.101 USD / kWh。发现焚化和反渗透策略分别在至少52.4吨和3120万吨的处理废物中实现收支平衡。某些立法和社会修改使广告策略在财务上可行。敏感性分析表明,两种策略的净现值都受到资本投资,填埋成本和电价变化的强烈影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号