首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >Environmental modelling of use of treated organic waste on agricultural land: a comparison of existing models for life cycle assessment of waste systems
【24h】

Environmental modelling of use of treated organic waste on agricultural land: a comparison of existing models for life cycle assessment of waste systems

机译:在农业土地上使用经过处理的有机废物的环境模型:废物系统生命周期评估的现有模型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Modelling of environmental impacts from the application of treated organic municipal solid waste (MSW) in agriculture differs widely between different models for environmental assessment of waste systems. In this comparative study five models were examined concerning quantification and impact assessment of environmental effects from land application of treated organic MSW: DST (Decision Support Tool, USA), IWM (Integrated Waste Management, UK), THE IFEU PROJECT (Germany), ORWARE (ORganic WAste REsearch, Sweden) and EASEWASTE (Environmental Assessment of Solid Waste Systems and Technologies, Denmark). DST and IWM are life cycle inventory (LCI) models, thus not performing actual impact assessment. The DST model includes only one water emission (biological oxygen demand) from compost leaching in the results and IWM considers only air emissions from avoided production of commercial fertilizers. THE IFEU PROJECT, ORWARE and EASEWASTE are life cycle assessment (LCA) models containing more detailed land application modules. A case study estimating the environmental impacts from land application of 1 ton of composted source sorted organic household waste was performed to compare the results from the different models and investigate the origin of any difference in type or magnitude of the results. The contributions from the LCI models were limited and did not depend on waste composition or local agricultural conditions. The three LCA models use the same overall approach for quantifying the impacts of the system. However, due to slightly different assumptions, quantification methods and environmental impact assessment, the obtained results varied clearly between the models. Furthermore, local conditions (e.g. soil type, farm type, climate and legal regulation) and waste composition strongly influenced the results of the environmental assessment.
机译:在废物系统的环境评估的不同模型之间,在农业中应用有机有机固体废物(MSW)产生的环境影响建模存在很大差异。在本比较研究中,研究了五个模型,这些模型涉及经过处理的有机城市固体废弃物土地应用对环境影响的量化和影响评估:DST(美国决策支持工具),IWM(英国综合废物管理),IFEU项目(德国),ORWARE (瑞典有机废物研究)和EASEWASTE(丹麦固体废物系统和技术的环境评估)。 DST和IWM是生命周期清单(LCI)模型,因此不执行实际影响评估。 DST模型仅包括堆肥浸出中的一种水排放(生物需氧量),IWM仅考虑避免生产商业肥料产生的空气排放。 IFEU项目,ORWARE和EASEWASTE是生命周期评估(LCA)模型,其中包含更详细的土地应用模块。进行了一个案例研究,估计了土地施用1吨堆肥后的有机分类生活垃圾产生的环境影响,以比较不同模型的结果,并调查结果类型或程度差异的根源。 LCI模型的贡献是有限的,并不取决于废物的成分或当地的农业条件。三种LCA模型使用相同的整体方法来量化系统的影响。但是,由于略有不同的假设,量化方法和环境影响评估,所获得的结果在模型之间明显不同。此外,当地条件(例如土壤类型,农场类型,气候和法律法规)和废物组成对环境评估的结果有很大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号