...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >A sustainability analysis of an incineration project in Serbia
【24h】

A sustainability analysis of an incineration project in Serbia

机译:塞尔维亚焚化项目的可持续性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The only option for municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment adopted so far in Serbia is landfilling. Similarly to other south-eastern European countries, Serbia is not recovering any energy from MSW. Fifty percent of electricity in Serbia is produced in coal-fired power plants with emission control systems dating from the 1980s. In this article, the option of MSW incineration with energy recovery is proposed and examined for the city of Novi Sad. A sustainability analysis consisting of financial, economic and sensitivity analyses was done in the form of a cost-benefit analysis following recommendations from the European Commission. Positive and negative social and environmental effects of electricity generation through incineration were valuated partly using conversion factors and shadow prices, and partly using the results of previous studies. Public aversion to MSW incineration was considered. The results showed that the incineration project would require external financial assistance, and that an increase of the electricity and/or a waste treatment fee is needed to make the project financially positive. It is also more expensive than the landfilling option. However, the economic analysis showed that society would have net benefits from an incineration project. The feed-in tariff addition of only €0.03 (KWh)~(-1) to the existing electricity price, which would enable the project to make a positive contribution to economic welfare, is lower than the actual external costs of electricity generation from coal in Serbia.
机译:到目前为止,塞尔维亚采用的城市固体废物(MSW)处理的唯一选择是填埋。与其他东南欧国家一样,塞尔维亚也没有从城市固体废弃物中回收任何能源。塞尔维亚有50%的电力来自燃煤电厂,其排放控制系统的历史可追溯至1980年代。在本文中,提出并研究了诺维萨德市城市生活垃圾焚化与能源回收的选择。根据欧洲委员会的建议,以成本效益分析的形式进行了由财务,经济和敏感性分析组成的可持续性分析。焚烧发电对社会和环境的正面和负面影响,一部分使用转换因子和影子价格进行评估,一部分使用先前的研究结果进行评估。考虑了公众对垃圾焚烧的厌恶。结果表明,焚烧项目将需要外部财政援助,并且需要增加电费和/或废物处理费才能使该项目的财务状况良好。它也比填埋场要贵。但是,经济分析表明,焚烧项目将为社会带来净收益。现有电价仅增加0.03欧元(KWh)〜(-1)的上网电价,这将使该项目为经济福利做出积极贡献,低于煤炭发电的实际外部成本在塞尔维亚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号