WHY 3D MAY WORK OCCASIONALLY: CASE REOPENED

摘要

This scholarly essay is a rebuttal to Roger Ebert, who claims that a??3D doesn't work and never willa?? and to James Cameron and Vince Pace, who claim that 3D is simply an extension of 2D whose techniques can be directly applied to 3D production. Even in the academic community, there seems to be some confusion about how we perceive depth and especially about the claim that 3D comes close to how we actually see the world around us. The framework for this study is a media-aesthetic examination of 3D, specifically how we see depth in 2D and 3D images; how the 3D illusion isachieved in film and TV; and what media-aesthetic principles are unique to 3D.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2012.706573