首页> 外文期刊>Visual Communication Quarterly >WHY 3D MAY WORK OCCASIONALLY: CASE REOPENED
【24h】

WHY 3D MAY WORK OCCASIONALLY: CASE REOPENED

机译:为什么3D有时可以工作:案例重新打开

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This scholarly essay is a rebuttal to Roger Ebert, who claims that a??3D doesn't work and never willa?? and to James Cameron and Vince Pace, who claim that 3D is simply an extension of 2D whose techniques can be directly applied to 3D production. Even in the academic community, there seems to be some confusion about how we perceive depth and especially about the claim that 3D comes close to how we actually see the world around us. The framework for this study is a media-aesthetic examination of 3D, specifically how we see depth in 2D and 3D images; how the 3D illusion isachieved in film and TV; and what media-aesthetic principles are unique to 3D.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2012.706573
机译:这篇学术论文是对罗杰·埃伯特(Roger Ebert)的反驳,罗杰·埃伯特(Roger Ebert)声称“ 3D无效且永远不会”。以及詹姆斯·卡梅隆(James Cameron)和文斯·佩斯(Vince Pace),他们声称3D只是2D的扩展,其技术可以直接应用于3D制作。即使在学术界,对于我们如何感知深度,尤其是关于3D接近我们实际看到周围世界的说法,似乎也有些困惑。这项研究的框架是对3D的媒体美学检查,特别是我们如何看待2D和3D图像的深度;电影和电视中如何实现3D幻觉;以及3D独特的媒体美学原理。 google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2012.706573

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号