...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation planning and technology >A slacks-based network DEA efficiency analysis of European airlines
【24h】

A slacks-based network DEA efficiency analysis of European airlines

机译:欧洲航空公司基于松弛的网络DEA效率分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models consider a system as a single-process 'black box'. There are, however, DEA approaches that consider a system as composed of distinct processes or stages, each one with its own inputs and outputs and with intermediate flows among the stages. In this paper, a network DEA approach to airline efficiency assessment is presented. One conclusion of the study is that the network DEA approach has more discriminative power than the single-process DEA approach and that the computed targets, efficiency scores and rankings are more valid. This is because network DEA allows for a more fine-grained analysis that leads to a more realistic estimation of the overall system production possibility set than the one assumed by conventional DEA. In other words, compared with network DEA the conventional, single-process DEA represents an aggregated analysis that merges all system processes with their inputs and outputs and ignores their internal flows. The main drawbacks are the need for more detailed data (i.e. at the process level) and the greater complexity of the resulting models, especially if there are inputs or outputs that are shared among the processes.
机译:传统的数据包络分析(DEA)模型将系统视为单进程的“黑匣子”。但是,有一些DEA方法认为系统是由不同的过程或阶段组成的,每个过程或阶段都有自己的输入和输出以及各阶段之间的中间流程。本文提出了一种用于航空公司效率评估的网络DEA方法。研究的一个结论是,网络DEA方法比单过程DEA方法具有更大的判别能力,并且计算出的目标,效率得分和排名更为有效。这是因为与传统DEA所假定的方法相比,网络DEA允许进行更细粒度的分析,从而对整个系统的生产可能性进行更实际的估计。换句话说,与网络DEA相比,传统的单进程DEA代表了一种聚合分析,该分析将所有系统进程与其输入和输出进行合并,而忽略其内部流程。主要缺点是需要更详细的数据(即在流程级别),并且所得模型的复杂性更高,尤其是在流程之间共享输入或输出的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号