...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation planning and technology >Online versus phone surveys: comparison of results for a bicycling survey
【24h】

Online versus phone surveys: comparison of results for a bicycling survey

机译:在线调查与电话调查:骑车调查的结果比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Researchers in the transportation field rely heavily on traditional random-digit-dialing phone surveys and increasingly on online surveys. Many studies have looked at the strengths and weaknesses of the two methods, but few have examined differences in the inferences that can be drawn from the data generated by the two survey methods. In this paper, we compare both descriptive and inferential results from online and phone surveys with identical questions conducted in Davis, California. Results show that although bicycling behavior does not differ across the two survey samples, many socio-demographic characteristics do. The models developed from each sample have several statistically indistinguishable coefficients but also notable differences in key explanatory factors. The results suggest that online and phone survey methods have the potential to produce significantly different results, both descriptively and inferentially.
机译:运输领域的研究人员在很大程度上依赖于传统的随机数字拨号电话调查,并且越来越多地依赖在线调查。许多研究都考察了这两种方法的优缺点,但是很少研究可以从这两种调查方法产生的数据中得出的推论的差异。在本文中,我们将在线和电话调查的描述性和推论性结果与在加利福尼亚州戴维斯进行的相同问题进行了比较。结果表明,尽管两个调查样本的骑自行车行为没有差异,但许多社会人口统计特征却不同。从每个样本开发的模型具有几个统计上无法区分的系数,但在关键解释因素上也有显着差异。结果表明,在线和电话调查方法具有描述性和推论性产生明显不同结果的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号