...
首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical and applied climatology >Response of the East Asian summer monsoon to doubled atmospheric CO_2: Coupled climate model simulations and projections under IPCC AR4
【24h】

Response of the East Asian summer monsoon to doubled atmospheric CO_2: Coupled climate model simulations and projections under IPCC AR4

机译:东亚夏季风对大气CO_2倍增的响应:IPCC AR4下的气候模式耦合模拟和预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The East Asian (China, Korea and Japan) summer monsoon precipitation and its variability are examined from the outputs of the coupled climate models performing coordinated experiments leading to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC AR4). Out of the 22 models examined, 14 reproduce the observed shape of the annual cycle well with peak during the boreal summer (June through August), but with varying magnitude. Three models simulate the maximum a month later and with lower magnitudes. Only one model considerably underestimates the magnitude of the annual cycle. The remaining 4 models show some deviations from the observed. Models are unable to simulate the minimum in July with peaks in June and August associated with northward shifts of the Meiyu-Changma-Baiu precipitation band. The realistic simulation of the annual cycle does not appear to depend on the model resolution. The inter-model variation is slightly larger during summer, implying larger diversity of the models in simulating summer monsoon precipitation. The spatial rainfall patterns are reasonably well simulated by most of the models, with several models able to simulate the precipitation associated with the Meiyu-Changma-Baiu frontal zone and that associated with the location of the subtropical high over the north Pacific. Simulated spatial distribution could be sensitive to model resolution as evidenced by two versions of MIROC3.2 model. The multi-model ensemble (MME) pattern reveals an underestimation of seasonal precipitation over the east coast of China, Korea-Japan peninsular and the adjoining oceanic regions. This may be related with the mass-flux based scheme employed for convective parameterization by majority of the models. Further the inter-model variation of precipitation is about 2 times stronger south of 30° N, than north of this latitude, indicating larger diversity of the coupled models in simulating low latitude precipitation. The simulated inter-annual variability is estimated by computing the mean summer monsoon seasonal rainfall and the coefficient of variability (CV). In general the mean observed seasonal precipitation of 542 mm and CV of 6.7% is very well simulated by most of the models. Except for one model mean seasonal precipitation varies from 400 to 650 mm. However the CV varies from 2 to 9%. Future projections under the radiative forcing of doubled CO_2 scenario are examined for individual models and by the MME technique. Changes in mean precipitation and variability are tested by the t-test and F-ratio respectively to evaluate their statistical significance. The changes in mean precipitation vary from -0.6% (CNRM-CM3) to about 14% (ECHO-G; UKMO-HadCM3). The MME technique reveals an increase varying from 5 to 10%, with an average of 7.8% (greater than the observed CV of 6.7%) over the East Asian region. However the increases are significant over the Korea-Japan peninsula and the adjoining north China region only. The increases may be attributed to the projected intensification of the subtropical high, Meiyu-Changma-Baiu frontal zone and the associated influx of moist air from the Pacific inland. The projected changes in the amount of precipitation are directly proportional to the projected changes in the strength of the subtropical high. Further the MME suggests a possible increase in the length of the summer monsoon precipitation period from late spring through early autumn. The changes in precipitation could be stabilized by controlling the CO_2 emissions.
机译:从耦合气候模型的输出结果进行了东亚(中国,韩国和日本)夏季风降水及其变化的研究,这些气候模型进行了导致政府间气候变化专门委员会第四次评估报告(IPCC AR4)的协调实验。在所检查的22个模型中,有14个很好地再现了观测到的年度周期形状,在北方夏季(6月至8月)达到峰值,但幅度却有所不同。三个模型在一个月后以较低的幅度模拟最大值。只有一种模型大大低估了年度周期的大小。其余4个模型显示出与观察到的一些偏差。模型无法模拟7月的最小值,6月和8月的峰值与Meiyu-Changma-Baiu降水带的北移有关。年度周期的实际模拟似乎并不取决于模型的分辨率。在夏季,模型间的变化略大,这意味着在模拟夏季季风降水时模型的多样性更大。大多数模型都很好地模拟了空间降雨模式,其中一些模型能够模拟与梅雨-常马-白牛额叶带有关的降水以及与北太平洋副热带高压位置有关的降水。如两个版本的MIROC3.2模型所证明的,模拟的空间分布可能对模型分辨率敏感。多模式合奏(MME)模式揭示了中国东海岸,朝鲜-日本半岛及邻近海洋地区的季节性降水被低估了。这可能与大多数模型用于对流参数化的基于质量通量的方案有关。此外,降水的模型间变化比该纬度以北的30°N以南大约强2倍,这表明在模拟低纬度降水时耦合模型的多样性更大。通过计算平均夏季季风季节降雨量和变异系数(CV)来估算模拟的年际变异。通常,大多数模型都很好地模拟了平均观测到的542 mm季节性降水和CV为6.7%。除一种模式外,平均季节性降水量在400至650毫米之间。但是,CV从2%到9%不等。对于单独的模型和MME技术,研究了CO_2倍增的辐射强迫下的未来预测。分别通过t检验和F比率检验平均降水量和变异性的变化,以评估其统计显着性。平均降水量的变化范围从-0.6%(CNRM-CM3)到大约14%(ECHO-G; UKMO-HadCM3)。 MME技术显示,东亚地区的增长率从5%​​到10%不等,平均为7.8%(大于所观察到的CV的6.7%)。然而,仅在朝鲜-日本半岛和毗邻的华北地区,这一增长是显着的。这种增加可能是由于预计副热带高压,梅雨-昌马-白牛锋区的集约化以及伴随的来自太平洋内陆的潮湿空气的涌入。预计的降水量变化与副热带高压强度的预计变化成正比。 MME进一步表明,从春季末到秋季初,夏季季风降水期的长度可能会增加。可以通过控制CO_2的排放来稳定降水的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号