...
首页> 外文期刊>The military balance >Misperceptions over total US defence allocations
【24h】

Misperceptions over total US defence allocations

机译:对美国国防总拨款的误解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to account for defence spending not included in the DoD budget, most US budget analysts follow the so-called 'National Defense' budget function detailed in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) records. This also contains allocations for nuclear weapons-related activities undertaken by the Department of Energy, and items such as the National Defense Stockpile of war-related commodities. However, even annual appropriations under the budget function - which are 'discretionary' appropriations that require annual approval from Congress - do not constitute the total defence allocation for the broader 'National Defense' category. Each year, there is an additional US$6-8bn in 'mandatory' spending (permanent or multi-year appropriations that do not require annual congressional approval) allocated for some military retirement, healthcare and other costs.
机译:为了考虑国防部预算中未包括的国防支出,大多数美国预算分析员都遵循管理和预算办公室(OMB)记录中详述的所谓“国防”预算职能。这还包括对能源部开展的与核武器有关的活动的拨款,以及与战争有关的商品的国防库存等项目。但是,即使是预算职能下的年度拨款(属于“全权”拨款,也需要国会每年批准),也不构成更广泛的“国防”类别的国防总拨款。每年,还会有6-8亿美元的“强制性”支出(不需要每年国会批准的永久或多年拨款)分配给一些军事退休,医疗保健和其他费用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The military balance》 |2014年第2014期|36-36|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号