...
首页> 外文期刊>Paedagogica Historica >Nursery schools for the few or the many? Childhood, education and the State in mid‐twentieth‐century England
【24h】

Nursery schools for the few or the many? Childhood, education and the State in mid‐twentieth‐century England

机译:几所或多所托儿所? 20世纪中叶的童年,教育与国家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prior to the outbreak of the Second World War, successive presidents and officials at the Board of Education made it clear that they believed there were three types of children in Britain - those who needed nursery schools to rescue them from degradation, those for whom a less expensive nursery class would do the job adequately and those who would be better off staying home with mother. However, by the time the 1944 Education Act was framed, national policy towards pre‐school provision had undergone a major transformation: nursery schools could provide the best start in life for everyone, should be available for every child from three to five and, crucially, should be the only form of childcare provision available. This change of direction was initiated by the government's inspectorate, and heavily promoted by members of the civil service. Professional bodies, such as the Nursery School Association and teaching unions, had very little influence over the decision‐making process. The needs of working mothers, who were likely to be adversely affected by the closure of wartime childcare facilities, were inadequately considered. Local Education Authorities, who generally favoured nursery classes, were, however, able to wring a last‐minute compromise from central government so that classes could be provided where schools were “inexpedient”. The fact that the new policy had been written in such isolation, without consideration for potential users, and had been messily hamstrung at the last moment meant that it was never implemented and must ultimately be considered a failure.View full textDownload full textKeywordsnursery education, Second World War, 1944 Education ActRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2010.530277
机译:在第二次世界大战爆发之前,教育委员会历届主席和官员都明确表示,他们相信英国有三种类型的孩子-那些需要托儿所以拯救他们免于退化的孩子,而那些孩子则少一些。昂贵的幼儿园班将能胜任这项工作,而那些与母亲呆在一起的人会更好。但是,在制定1944年《教育法》之时,关于学前教育的国家政策已经发生了重大变化:托儿所可以为每个人提供最佳的生活起点,应该为每个三到五岁的孩子提供服务,并且至关重要的是,应该是提供托儿服务的唯一形式。方向的改变是由政府的监察部门发起的,并由公务员大力推动。专业机构,如幼儿园协会和教学工会,对决策过程几乎没有影响。未充分考虑战时托儿设施的关闭可能对工作母亲的需求造成不利影响。但是,通常偏爱幼儿园班的地方教育主管部门能够在最后一刻向中央政府屈服,从而可以在“不方便”学校上课。新政策是这样孤立地编写的,没有考虑到潜在的用户,并且在最后一刻被凌乱地破坏了这一事实,这意味着它从未得到实施,最终必须被视为失败。查看全文下载全文1944年世界大战教育法》相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra- 4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2010.530277

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号