首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Comparing public and scientific discourse in the context of innovation systems
【24h】

Comparing public and scientific discourse in the context of innovation systems

机译:在创新系统中比较公共话语和科学话语

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Innovation as a systemic process is not only driven by science and technology but has diverse sources. While there are (numeric) indicators to map S&T developments such as patents, publications or standards, new indicators are required to map other areas of the innovation system. In this regard, one option is the examination of news reporting. News is a recognized channel for innovation diffusion and plays an important role in informing society. To contrast changes and developments in science and society, specifically the link between both is addressed in this article by comparing the content of news articles and scientific publications. Thus, the aim of this article is to first argue the benefit of integrating the media in the innovation system debate because of its recognized role in innovation diffusion and to develop a methodology to automatically compare scientific and media discourses. To process the volume of textual data according to a common analytical scheme, a text mining framework has been developed. The results offer valuable input for examining the present state of themes and technologies and, thereby, support future planning activities. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:作为系统性过程的创新不仅由科学技术驱动,而且具有多种来源。尽管有(数字)指标可以绘制出诸如专利,出版物或标准之类的科技发展图,但仍需要新的指标来绘制创新体系的其他领域。在这方面,一种选择是检查新闻报道。新闻是公认的创新传播渠道,在为社会提供信息方面起着重要作用。为了对比科学和社会的变化与发展,本文通过比较新闻文章和科学出版物的内容来特别解决两者之间的联系。因此,本文的目的是首先论证将媒体整合到创新体系辩论中的好处,因为它在创新传播中具有公认的作用,并开发一种自动比较科学和媒体话语的方法。为了根据通用分析方案处理大量文本数据,已开发了文本挖掘框架。结果为检查主题和技术的当前状态提供了宝贵的意见,从而为将来的计划活动提供了支持。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号