首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Social construction of stormwater control measures in Melbourne and Copenhagen: A discourse analysis of technological change, embedded meanings and potential mainstreaming
【24h】

Social construction of stormwater control measures in Melbourne and Copenhagen: A discourse analysis of technological change, embedded meanings and potential mainstreaming

机译:墨尔本和哥本哈根的雨水控制措施的社会建设:对技术变革,内在含义和潜在主流化的话语分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Urban stormwater systems in cities around the world are challenged by urbanization and climate change, and a range of Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs) are being implemented as solutions to these challenges. We developed a conceptual framework of technological stabilization based on Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) and Transition Science, and conducted 16 in-depth actor interviews as a basis for mapping the historical development of in the two cities. The SCMs applied in Melbourne and Copenhagen are similar, but using a new framework for technological stabilization we identify differences in their application due to different physical, organizational and cultural contexts in the two cities, drought being the main driver during the past decade in Melbourne (1997-2010) and pluvial flooding in Copenhagen (2007-). In Melbourne there is currently a strong integrated understanding of SCMs: after decades of "new technology" development, "testing" and "opportunity" seeking a large degree of "agreement" about stormwater management as a mainstreamed professional practice has arisen. In Copenhagen there are currently multiple conflicting understandings of SCMs and signs of an emerging integrated understanding that offers "opportunities" for further development and implementation. It is clear from Melbourne's history that: successful full scale demonstration projects supported and developed by a wide range of actors helps building a common vision for SCM technologies, supportive policies across several governmental levels provide incentives for implementation, and inclusive actions in the closure process provides a sense of ownership for SCM technologies across disciplines. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:世界各地城市的城市雨水系统都受到城市化和气候变化的挑战,并且正在实施一系列雨水控制措施(SCM)作为应对这些挑战的解决方案。我们基于技术社会建设(SCOT)和过渡科学建立了技术稳定的概念框架,并进行了16次深入的演员访谈,以此作为绘制两个城市历史发展的基础。墨尔本和哥本哈根采用的SCM相似,但是使用新的技术稳定框架,我们发现由于两个城市的物理,组织和文化背景不同,其应用也有所不同,干旱是过去十年墨尔本的主要驱动力( (1997-2010年)和哥本哈根的洪水(2007-)。在墨尔本,目前对SCM具有很强的综合理解:经过数十年的“新技术”开发,“测试”和“机会”,寻求将雨水管理作为一种主流的专业实践达成较大程度的“协议”。在哥本哈根,目前对供应链管理的理解存在多种冲突,并且出现了正在形成的综合理解的迹象,为进一步发展和实施提供了“机会”。从墨尔本的历史中可以清楚地看出:由广泛参与者支持和开发的成功的大规模示范项目,有助于建立SCM技术的共同愿景,多个政府级别的支持性政策为实施提供了动力,封闭过程中的包容性行动提供了跨学科的SCM技术的主人翁感。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号