...
首页> 外文期刊>Systemic Practice and Action Research >Combining Participative Action Research with an Adapted House of Quality Framework for the Stakeholder Development of Performance Indicators in Local Government
【24h】

Combining Participative Action Research with an Adapted House of Quality Framework for the Stakeholder Development of Performance Indicators in Local Government

机译:将参与式行动研究与适用于地方政府绩效指标绩效指标的优质框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to present and examine how a Participative Action Research (PAR) process and an adapted House of Quality framework were conjoined in the successful development of Performance Indicators for cultural precincts operated by two local government administrations. The use of such a combination has not previously been identified in literature or reported on in practice. The coalescing of PAR with a House of Quality (a quality function deployment framework) in these two empirical cases helps address a methodological gap in knowledge concerning how they may complement and enrich each other in order to generate participant learning, and generate practical outcomes that can underpin continuous and locally relevant service improvement. Through the use of this combination in these cases, public administrators appeared to demonstrate genuine community consultation and, with the community representatives involved, jointly identified, critically evaluated and prioritised a diverse set of community and agency expectations in determining Performance Indicators for their cultural precincts. PAR also underpinned stakeholders' ownership of the outcomes and refinement of the House of Quality framework. Any difficulties in using this combination in this context are also discussed. Based on the outcomes of this study, we suggest that this combination may have conceptual and practical utility and generate similar benefits in multiple performance measurement development situations in other public organisations.
机译:本文的目的是展示和研究参与行动研究(PAR)流程和适应的优质框架,在两次当地政府主管部门运营的文化区域的绩效指标的成功开发中。以前没有在文学中鉴定使用这种组合或在实践中报告。在这两个实证情况下,与质量之家(质量职能部署框架)的施加相结合有助于了解有关他们如何补充和丰富的知识的方法论差距,以便产生参与者学习,并产生能够的实际结果支撑连续和本地相关的服务改进。通过在这些案件中使用这种组合,公共管理人员似乎展示了真正的社区磋商,并与社区代表一起参与,共同确定,严格评估和优先考虑了在确定其文化区域的绩效指标方面的各种社区和代理期望。另外,利益攸关方对质量框架之家的成果和改进的所有权。还讨论了在此上下文中使用这种组合的任何困难。根据本研究的结果,我们建议这种组合可能具有概念和实用的实用性,并在其他公共组织的多种性能测量开发情况下产生类似的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号