...
首页> 外文期刊>Survey methodology >An alternative way of estimating a cumulative logistic model with complex survey data
【24h】

An alternative way of estimating a cumulative logistic model with complex survey data

机译:复杂调查数据累计逻辑模型的另一种方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When fitting an ordered categorical variable with L 2 levels to a set of covariates onto complex survey data, it is common to assume that the elements of the population fit a simple cumulative logistic regression model (proportional-odds logistic-regression model). This means the probability that the categorical variable is at or below some level is a binary logistic function of the model covariates. Moreover, except for the intercept, the values of the logistic-regression parameters are the same at each level. The conventional "design-based" method used for fitting the proportional-odds model is based on pseudo-maximum likelihood. We compare estimates computed using pseudo-maximum likelihood with those computed by assuming an alternative design-sensitive robust model-based framework. We show with a simple numerical example how estimates using the two approaches can differ. The alternative approach is easily extended to fit a general cumulative logistic model, in which the parallel-lines assumption can fail. A test of that assumption easily follows.
机译:当用L> 2级拟合一个有序的分类变量,以将一组协变量进入复杂的调查数据时,通常认为人口的元素适合简单的累积逻辑回归模型(比例赔率逻辑回归模型)。这意味着分类变量处于或低于某些级别的概率是模型协调因子的二进制逻辑函数。此外,除截距外,逻辑回归参数的值在每个级别相同。用于拟合比例达赔模型的传统“基于设计的”方法基于伪最大可能性。我们通过假设基于设计敏感的鲁棒模型的框架来使用伪最大可能性计算使用伪最大可能性计算的估计。我们展示了一个简单的数字示例,如何使用这两种方法的估计可以不同。替代方法很容易扩展以适合一般的累积逻辑模型,其中并行线假设可能会失败。对这种假设的测试很容易遵循。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号