...
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Philosophy and Education >Bildung – A construction of a historyof philosophy of education
【24h】

Bildung – A construction of a historyof philosophy of education

机译:建筑–教育哲学史的建筑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper examines the “prehistory” in the 18th century of the theory of Bildung. Pedagogical historiography commonly traces the theory back to the influence of Anthony Ashley Cooper, third Earl of Shaftesbury, who is held to be the founder of the concept of “innere Bildung; on the grounds that Shaftesbury’s concept of “inward form” was translated into German as Bildung. The study focuses on the reception of Shaftesbury’s writings in the German-speaking realm in the 17th century in order to discover the contexts of discourse in which this reception took place and to find out what significance the various discourses had for the formulation of a German “theory of Bildung.” What is revealed are varied influences of a religious, literary theory, and aesthetics nature that give indications as to why the construct of Bildung has remained diffuse and excessive in the German tradition up to the very present. It is also shown that the concept, in comparison to other discourses, found its way into the pedagogical discourse relatively late, which may be another reason for the difficulties that the German theory of Bildung continues to present to the science of pedagogy.
机译:本文考察了Bildung理论在18世纪的“史前史”。教育史学通常将这一理论追溯到沙夫茨伯里(Shaftesbury)第三任伯爵安东尼·阿什利·库珀(Anthony Ashley Cooper)的影响,后者被认为是“内在的Bildung”概念的创始人。理由是沙夫茨伯里(Shaftesbury)的“内在形式”概念被翻译成德语的Bildung。该研究的重点是在17世纪德语国家中接受Shaftesbury著作的接受,以便发现接受这种接受的话语语境,并发现各种话语对德国“ Bildung理论”。所揭示的是宗教,文学理论和美学本性的各种影响,这表明为什么Bildung的结构在德国传统中一直保持分散和过度。还表明,与其他话语相比,该概念进入教育话语的时间相对较晚,这可能是德国Bildung理论继续对教育学提出困难的另一个原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号