...
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Health Technology and Informatics >Trends in Evaluation Research 1982 - 2002: A Study on how the Quality of IT Evaluation Studies Develop
【24h】

Trends in Evaluation Research 1982 - 2002: A Study on how the Quality of IT Evaluation Studies Develop

机译:1982-2002年评估研究的趋势:有关IT评估研究质量如何发展的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

During the last years the significance of evaluation studies as well as the interest in adequate methods and approaches for evaluation has grown in medical informatics. In order to put this discussion into historical perspective of evaluation research, we conducted a systematic review on trends in evaluation research of information technology in health care from 1982 to 2002. The inventory is based on a systematic literature search in PubMed. In the first step of our inventory, we concentrated on describing long-term developments in questions, approaches, setting, methods and criteria of IT evaluation studies as described in the abstracts of the identified 1.035 publications. We found some signs of a maturation of evaluation research in medical informatics. However, these findings are only based on study abstracts that do not give sufficient information to assess the quality of studies in more detail. In a second step of our inventory, we are now looking at the quality of IT evaluation studies in health care, describing in more detail study design and assessing 10 quality indicators. For this second step, we analyse a randomized sample of 105 evaluation full papers in more detail. Besides more descriptive details on study design, the results will show whether IT evaluation studies are credible, and how their quality changed in the last 20 years. An interim analysis of the first 64 papers shows a stable quality of IT evaluation studies over the last 20 years.
机译:在过去的几年中,医学信息学对评估研究的重要性以及对适当评估方法和方法的兴趣不断增长。为了使这种讨论成为评估研究的历史视角,我们对1982年至2002年医疗保健信息技术评估研究的趋势进行了系统回顾。该清单基于PubMed中的系统文献检索。在清单的第一步中,我们专注于描述IT评估研究的问题,方法,设置,方法和标准的长期发展,如确定的1.035出版物的摘要中所述。我们发现医学信息学评估研究已经成熟的迹象。但是,这些发现仅基于研究摘要,而这些摘要并未提供足够的信息来更详细地评估研究质量。在清单的第二步中,我们现在正在研究医疗保健中IT评估研究的质量,更详细地描述研究设计并评估10个质量指标。对于第二步,我们将更详细地分析105篇评价全文的随机样本。除了研究设计的更多描述性细节外,结果还将显示IT评估研究是否可信以及在过去20年中它们的质量如何变化。对前64篇论文的中期分析显示,过去20年中,IT评估研究的质量稳定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号