...
首页> 外文期刊>The structural design of tall buildings >ASSESSMENT OF MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS AND CONVENTIONAL NONLINEAR STATIC PROCEDURE WITH LOAD DISTRIBUTIONS OF FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FOR HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS
【24h】

ASSESSMENT OF MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS AND CONVENTIONAL NONLINEAR STATIC PROCEDURE WITH LOAD DISTRIBUTIONS OF FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FOR HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS

机译:高层建筑联邦应急管理机构负荷分配的模态跟踪分析和常规非线性静态过程评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The nonlinear static pushover analysis technique is mostly used in the performance-based design of structures. However, the pushover analysis with load distributions of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) loses its accuracy in estimating the seismic responses of long-period structures where higher mode effects are important. Recently, modal pushover analysis (MPA) has been proposed to consider these effects. Hence, FEMA load patterns and MPA are evaluated in the current study and compared with inelastic response history analysis. These approximate procedures are applied to medium-rise (10 and 15 stories) and high-rise (20 and 30 stories) buildings; advantages and limitations of them are elaborated. It is shown that MPA procedure presents significant advantage over FEMA load distributions in predicting story drifts. MPA is able to compute hinge plastic rotations better than FEMA load distributions at upper floor levels of high-rise buildings due to considering higher mode effects by this procedure, but both are unsuccessful in predicting hinge plastic rotations with acceptable accuracy.
机译:非线性静态推覆分析技术主要用于基于性能的结构设计中。但是,联邦紧急事务管理局(FEMA)进行的带有载荷分布的推覆分析在估计较高模式效应很重要的长周期结构的地震响应时失去了准确性。最近,已提出模态下推分析(MPA)来考虑这些影响。因此,在当前研究中评估了FEMA载荷模式和MPA,并与非弹性响应历史分析进行了比较。这些近似程序适用于中层(10层和15层)和高层(20层和30层)建筑物;阐述了它们的优点和局限性。结果表明,MPA程序在预测故事漂移方面比FEMA负载分布具有明显优势。由于此过程考虑了较高的模态效应,因此MPA能够比高层建筑的高层楼层上的FEMA载荷分布更好地计算铰链塑料旋转,但是在以可接受的精度预测铰链塑料旋转方面,MPA均未成功。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The structural design of tall buildings》 |2010年第3期|291-308|共18页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran;

    International Earthquake and Seismology Research Centre, Tehran, Iran;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号