...
首页> 外文期刊>Structural change and economic dynamics >Do selected firms show higher performance? The case of Portugal's innovation subsidy
【24h】

Do selected firms show higher performance? The case of Portugal's innovation subsidy

机译:选定的公司表现更好吗?葡萄牙创新补贴案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper evaluates the effect of a Portuguese innovation subsidy (SI Innovation), launched in 2007-2013, on firm performance. Using counterfactual analysis methods and a sample composed of firms with approved applications and non-approved ones, the study shows that firms with the best proposals and with higher performance in the pre-intervention period are more likely to receive the subsidy. A positive and sustainable effect of the subsidy, within a time-window of 5 years, on fixed asset investment and technological progress are found. However, it seems that public support has only an effect on the size of investment and not on the decision to invest. Subsidized firms also perform less well than matched non-subsidized ones, and they are less effective in achieving the planned goals concerning labour productivity and value creation. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文评估了2007年至2013年推出的葡萄牙创新补贴(SI Innovation)对公司绩效的影响。通过使用反事实分析方法以及由批准申请和未批准申请组成的公司组成的样本,研究表明,在干预前期间,具有最佳建议和更高绩效的公司更有可能获得补贴。补贴在5年内对固定资产投资和技术进步产生了积极和可持续的影响。但是,似乎公众的支持只会影响投资规模,而不影响投资决策。与无补贴的公司相比,有补贴的公司的绩效也较差,并且在实现有关劳动生产率和价值创造的计划目标方面效率较低。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号