...
首页> 外文期刊>Structural change and economic dynamics >Financialization and industrial policies in Japan and Korea: Evolving institutional complementarities and loss of state capabilities
【24h】

Financialization and industrial policies in Japan and Korea: Evolving institutional complementarities and loss of state capabilities

机译:日本和韩国的金融化和产业政策:不断发展的制度互补和国家能力的丧失

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this article is to analyze the revival of industrial policies from the late 2000 s in Japan and Korea and their limitations. Our approach has two major characteristics. First, we adopt the perspective of historical institutionalism to focus on the relation between IPs and financial systems and study their evolution over the last 40 years. Second, by mobilizing the concepts of institutional complementarities and hierarchy, we discuss the limits of this revival in a context of liberalized financial systems, to which government entities in charge of industrial policies have contributed. Our major result is that, in the context of financialization, past complementarities of the developmental state have weakened and contradictions have arisen. It resulted in a restructuration of state capabilities to design and implement industrial policies, and to its inability to subordinate finance to its goals, despite the discourses and ambitions of governments. However, and this is our second result, comparison between Japan and Korea also allows us to identify some significant differences in the initial institutional arrangements and in the process of institutional change, which are analyzed as sources of greater state capabilities in Korea than in Japan in the current period. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文的目的是分析2000年代后期日本和韩国的产业政策的复兴及其局限性。我们的方法有两个主要特征。首先,我们采用历史制度主义的观点来关注知识产权与金融体系之间的关系,并研究它们在过去40年中的演变。其次,通过动员制度互补性和等级制的概念,我们在自由化的金融体系的背景下讨论了这种复兴的局限性,而负责工业政策的政府实体对此做出了贡献。我们的主要结果是,在金融化的背景下,发展国家过去的互补性减弱了,并出现了矛盾。尽管政府的话语和野心勃勃,它导致了国家设计和实施工业政策的能力的重组,并使其无法将资金从属于其目标。但是,这是我们的第二个结果,日本和韩国之间的比较也使我们能够确定出初始制度安排和制度变迁过程中的一些重大差异,这些差异被分析为韩国比日本在日本具有更大国家能力的来源。当前时期。 (C)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号