...
首页> 外文期刊>Solar Energy >Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of maize-biogas and photovoltaics on a land use basis
【24h】

Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of maize-biogas and photovoltaics on a land use basis

机译:基于土地利用的玉米-沼气和光伏发电对环境影响的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study aims to stimulate the discussion on how to optimize a sustainable energy mix from an environmental perspective and how to apply existing renewable energy sources in the most efficient way. Ground-mounted photovoltaics (PV) and the maize-biogas-electric-ity route are compared with regard to their potential to mitigate environmental pressure, assuming that a given agricultural area is available for energy production. Existing life cycle assessment (LCA) studies are taken as a basis to analyse environmental impacts of those technologies in relation to conventional technology for power and heat generation. The life-cycle-wide mitigation potential per area used is calculated for the impact categories non-renewable energy input, green house gas (GHG) emissions, acidification and eutrophication. The environmental performance of each system depends on the scenario that is assumed for end energy use (electricity and heat supply have been contemplated). In all scenarios under consideration, PV turns out to be superior to biogas in almost all studied impact categories. Even when maize is used for electricity production in connection with very efficient heat usage, and reduced PV performance is assumed to account for intermittence, PV can still mitigate about four times the amount of green house gas emissions and non-renewable energy input compared to maize-biogas. Soil erosion, which can be entirely avoided with PV, exceeds soil renewal rates roughly 20-fold on maize fields. Regarding the overall Eco-indicator 99 (H) score under most favourable assumptions for the maize-biogas route, PV has still a more than 100% higher potential to mitigate environmental burden. At present, the key advantages of biogas are its price and its availability without intermittence. In the long run, and with respect to more efficient land use, biogas might preferably be produced from organic waste or manure, whereas PV should be integrated into buildings and infrastructures.
机译:本研究旨在激发有关如何从环境角度优化可持续能源结构以及如何以最有效的方式利用现有可再生能源的讨论。假设将给定的农业面积用于能源生产,则比较地面安装的光伏(PV)和玉米-沼气-电力路线在缓解环境压力方面的潜力。现有的生命周期评估(LCA)研究被用作分析这些技术相对于传统的发电和供热技术的环境影响的基础。针对不可再生能源输入,温室气体(GHG)排放,酸化和富营养化的影响类别,计算了所使用区域在整个生命周期内的缓解潜力。每个系统的环境性能取决于为最终能源使用而设想的情景(已经考虑了电力和热供应)。在考虑的所有情况下,PV在几乎所有研究的影响类别中都优于沼气。即使将玉米用于非常高效的热能发电,并且假设降低的PV性能也可以解释间歇性问题,与玉米相比,PV仍可减少约四倍的温室气体排放量和不可再生能源输入-沼气。 PV可以完全避免水土流失,它超过了玉米田的土壤更新率约20倍。在玉米-沼气路线最有利的假设下,关于整体生态指标99(H)的评分,PV减轻环境负担的潜力仍然高出100%以上。目前,沼气的主要优势在于其价格和无间歇性的可获得性。从长远来看,就更有效的土地利用而言,沼气可能最好由有机废物或粪便产生,而光伏应整合到建筑物和基础设施中。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Solar Energy》 |2010年第7期|P.1255-1263|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for Sustainable Development, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK;

    Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. P.B. 100480, 42004 Wuppertal, Germany;

    Centre for Sustainable Development, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    LCA; land use; biogas; maize; photovoltaics; renewable energy;

    机译:LCA;土地利用;沼气玉米;光伏再生能源;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号