...
首页> 外文期刊>Solar Energy >Thermo-economic and comparative analyses of two recently proposed optimization approaches for circular heliostat fields: Campo radial-staggered and biomimetic spiral
【24h】

Thermo-economic and comparative analyses of two recently proposed optimization approaches for circular heliostat fields: Campo radial-staggered and biomimetic spiral

机译:两种最新提出的圆形定日镜场优化方法的热经济和比较分析:Campo径向交错和仿生螺旋

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, comparative analyses between two newly proposed circular heliostat field layout designs, i.e. Campo radial-staggered and biomimetic spiral layouts are carried out. Moreover, different optimization objectives including annual weighted efficiency, annual unweighted efficiency, and levelized cost of energy are considered for field layout optimization. In addition, the effects of different design variables, such as the central tower height, number of heliostats in the field, receiver's dimensions and size of the mirrors on the field thermal and economical capabilities are investigated. Finally, the analysis' results indicate that optimum weighted efficiency for Campo radial-staggered and biomimetic spiral layouts are 61.6% and 61.5%, whereas the optimum levelized cost of energy for both methods are 32.4 USS/MWh. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,对两种新提出的圆形定日镜场布局设计(即Campo径向交错和仿生螺旋布局)进行了比较分析。此外,现场布局优化考虑了不同的优化目标,包括年度加权效率,年度未加权效率和均等的能源成本。此外,还研究了不同设计变量的影响,例如中心塔的高度,现场的定日镜的数量,接收器的尺寸和反射镜的尺寸对现场的热经济性的影响。最后,分析结果表明,Campo径向交错和仿生螺旋布局的最佳加权效率分别为61.6%和61.5%,而两种方法的最佳平均能源成本为32.4 USS / MWh。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号